Should academic journals publish e-cigarette research linked to tobacco companies?

CONTEXT Electronic cigarettes are currently polarizing professional opinion. Some public health experts regard them as an effective smoking cessation aid and a vital means of reducing active and passive smoking, while others regard them as another attempt by the tobacco industry to create new customers and addicts. These different attitudes unsurprisingly yield different conclusions regarding both the appropriate regulation of e-cigarettes and the ethical status of research funded by, or conducted in, cooperation with the tobacco industry. AIM This paper examines whether e-cigarette research linked to the tobacco industry should be regarded as an exception to the rule that tobacco industry research is so tainted by conflicts of interest that journals should refuse to publish them, or at the very least treat them as a special case for scrutiny. RESULTS Despite the fact that e-cigarettes can be used for smoking cessation, most of the conflicts of interest that apply to other tobacco research also apply to e-cigarette research linked to that industry. CONCLUSION Journals that currently refuse to publish findings from studies linked to tobacco companies have no reason to make an exception in the case of e-cigarettes.

[1]  S. Martins,et al.  Patterns of youth tobacco and polytobacco usage: The shift to alternative tobacco products , 2017, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[2]  J. Etter E-cigarettes: methodological and ideological issues and research priorities , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[3]  M. Mckee,et al.  Use and abuse of statistics in tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[4]  J. Etter,et al.  Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit. , 2014, Addiction.

[5]  Z. Kmietowicz E-cigarettes latest: users on the up but rules tighten , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Simon Chapman,et al.  E-cigarettes: the best and the worst case scenarios for public health—an essay by Simon Chapman , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  John R Ashton,et al.  Regulation of electronic cigarettes , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Julia Hoeng,et al.  A 28-day rat inhalation study with an integrated molecular toxicology endpoint demonstrates reduced exposure effects for a prototypic modified risk tobacco product compared with conventional cigarettes. , 2014, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  L. Phillips,et al.  Estimating the Harms of Nicotine-Containing Products Using the MCDA Approach , 2014, European Addiction Research.

[10]  D. Kamerow The poisonous “juice” in e-cigarettes , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Emily Savell,et al.  How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  A. Fairchild,et al.  The renormalization of smoking? E-cigarettes and the tobacco "endgame". , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  C. Proctor Policy of banning tobacco funded research is “antiscience” , 2013, BMJ.

[14]  I. Pavord,et al.  Journal policy on research funded by the tobacco industry , 2013, BMJ.

[15]  S. Casswell Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Why do we not see the corporate interests of the alcohol industry as clearly as we see those of the tobacco industry? , 2013, Addiction.

[16]  A. McCright,et al.  Organized Climate Change Denial , 2011 .

[17]  J. Lupton,et al.  Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  J. Wardle,et al.  Smoking status of step-parents as a risk factor for smoking in adolescence. , 2008, Addiction.

[19]  M. Mckee,et al.  The whole truth and nothing but the truth? The research that Philip Morris did not want you to see , 2005, The Lancet.

[20]  Peter Brimblecombe,et al.  Monitoring the future , 2010 .