Perceptual-Shaping Comparison of DWT-Based Pixel-Wise Masking Model with DCT-Based Watson Model

It is very important to perceptually shape the watermark signal before embedding it into a host image according to the characteristics of the HVS (human vision system) since watermark invisibility is a necessary requirement for a successful watermarking application. Two popular HVS models have been proposed to deal with this problem: DCT-based Watson model and DWT-based PWM (pixel-wise masking) model, which correspond to the DCT-based and DWT-based watermarking techniques, respectively. Even though there is a common belief that the PWM model is better than the Watson model, there have been no studies that compare these two approaches. This paper is devoted to such a comparison. Our results show that the believed superiority of the PWM model relative to the Watson model is not correct and the Watson model indeed outperforms the PWM model. We argue that more accurate masking strategies in the wavelet domain are needed for DWT-based watermarking applications.

[1]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Redundant-wavelet watermarking with pixel-wise masking , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[2]  Mauro Barni,et al.  Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Applying informed coding and embedding to design a robust high-capacity watermark , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Hong Shen,et al.  Toward improved wavelet-based watermarking using the pixel-wise masking model , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[7]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..