Approach of Land Cover Based Asymptotic Curve Number Regression Equation to Estimate Runoff

The Natural Resources Conservation Service-Curve Number (NRCS-CN) method has been used widely for estimation of direct runoff. However, the determination methods of CN values for land covers from the National Engineering Handbook Chapter 4 (NEH-4) are inadequate due to uncertainty raised in determining the of the hydrologic soil group, which could change from reported soil survey data due to soil compaction and other human activities. To overcome these drawbacks, an asymptotic CN (ACN) regression equation for the relationship between measured streamflow and rainfall for gauged river basins (ACN-RB) was developed and used in various studies. The ACN-RB determines various CN values depending on the amount of rainfall in an event. The ACN-RB has limitations in application to ungauged river basin because the ACN-based CN values do not consider various land covers. Accordingly, 13 land cover-based asymptotic CN regression equations (LC-ACN-REs) were developed and evaluated in this study by comparing estimated direct runoff with measured data. The estimated direct runoff using the LC-ACN-REs, which were classified as “standard types”, matched observed direct runoff well, as evidenced by a Nash-Sutcliff efficiency (NSE) value of 0.78 for Jungrang A basin and a NSE value of 0.73 for Tancheon A basin. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Youn Shik Park,et al.  A Web-Based Model to Estimate the Impact of Best Management Practices , 2014 .

[2]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT 1 , 2005 .

[3]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data , 1993 .

[4]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[5]  J. Valiantzas,et al.  SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds – the two-CN system approach , 2011 .

[6]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  SCS-CN based time-distributed sediment yield model , 2008 .

[7]  J. Arnold,et al.  Suitability of SWAT for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project: Comparison on USDA Agricultural Research Service Watersheds , 2007 .

[8]  M. R. Adams,et al.  Runoff Curve Numbers for 10 Small Forested Watersheds in the Mountains of the Eastern United States , 2012 .

[9]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Development of genetic algorithm-based optimization module in WHAT system for hydrograph analysis and model application , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  J. Harbor A Practical Method for Estimating the Impact of Land-Use Change on Surface Runoff, Groundwater Recharge and Wetland Hydrology , 1994 .

[11]  M. Dholakia,et al.  Impact of Monthly Curve Number on Daily Runoff Estimation for Ozat Catchment in India , 2014 .

[12]  M. Verma,et al.  SCS curve number method in Narmada basin , 2012 .

[13]  Nam-won Kim,et al.  Estimation of Runoff Curve Number for Chungju Dam Watershed Using SWAT , 2008 .

[14]  K. Banasik,et al.  EMPIRICAL DETERMINATION OF RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FOR A SMALL AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED IN POLAND , 2010 .

[15]  Tae‐Woong Kim,et al.  Comparing Calculation Techniques for Effective Rainfalls Using NRCS-CN Method: Focused on Introducing Weighted Average and Slope-based CN , 2014 .

[16]  R. McCuen Hydrologic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[17]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[18]  J. Choi,et al.  Effects of calibration on L-THIA GIS runoff and pollutant estimation. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  E. Wilson Engineering Hydrology , 1974 .