Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia

The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new "words" (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new "words" were used as controls. Number of trials to criterion was significantly lower, and number of words remembered at follow-up was significantly higher for the orthographic cueing method. Two aphasic patients with damage to the output lexicons were also rehabilitated with the same three methods. In both patients the orthographic cueing method was significantly more efficacious. The differences in learning efficacy of the three methods are discussed.

[1]  E. Renzi,et al.  Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test , 1978, Cortex.

[2]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? , 1990, Cortex.

[3]  E. Vakil,et al.  Active Versus Passive Procedural Learning in Older and Younger Adults , 1998 .

[4]  David Howard,et al.  On the Origin of Semantic Errors in Naming: Evidence from the Case of a Global Aphasic , 1984 .

[5]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Generation effects in frequency judgment. , 1988 .

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Interaction of Lexical and Non-Lexical Processing Mechanisms: Evidence from Anomia , 1991, Cortex.

[7]  A E Hillis,et al.  Efficacy and generalization of treatment for aphasic naming errors. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[9]  H. Goodglass,et al.  The Effects of Cuing on Picture Naming in Aphasia , 1978, Cortex.

[10]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Treatment of Anomia Resulting from Output Lexical Damage: Analysis of Two Cases , 1996, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Smith.  Recall of frequency of occurrence of self-generated and examiner-provided words after frontal or temporal lobectomy , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Carole Pound,et al.  The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients , 1990 .

[13]  L. A. McElroy,et al.  Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect , 1982 .

[14]  J. Morton,et al.  Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. A comparison of two therapy methods. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  The rites of righting writing: Homophone remediation in acquired dysgraphia , 1987 .

[16]  Sally Byng,et al.  Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapy , 1988 .

[17]  D. H. Carson,et al.  On Learning Characteristics of the Adult Aphasic , 1968 .

[18]  David Howard,et al.  The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia , 1985 .

[19]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[20]  R. Tikofsky.  Two studies of verbal learning by adult aphasics. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.