An integrated model of the knowledge antecedents for exploring software process improvement success

Software process improvement (SPI) is a knowledge activity that is critical to the excellence of information system development. This study observes two knowledge gaps in the quest for SPI success and proposes a research model that integrates existing knowledge antecedents to address these gaps. Based on organizational learning theory and the dynamic capability view, the proposed model consolidates a firm's absorptive capacity (AC), learning ability in terms of exploration and exploitation and knowledge sharing (KS), and it examines the contextual relationships among these knowledge antecedents on the path to SPI success.,A quantitative research design is implemented to examine the model with a sample of 138 SPI-certified organizations in Taiwan and Mainland China. The partial least squares (PLS) technique is used for the data analysis.,The results reveal the following findings. First, AC triggers the effect of exploration/exploitation on SPI success. Second, KS fosters exploitation but has an insignificant influence on exploration. Third, KS can promote AC, and it serves as the sourcing mechanism for all of the knowledge antecedents. Overall, an integrative set of knowledge learning routes is presented in guiding software firms on the way to SPI success.,In addition to identification of the two knowledge gaps, this study advances the authors’ understanding by comprehending the causal associations of the four knowledge antecedents on the way to SPI success.

[1]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[2]  Casper Lassenius,et al.  Communities of practice in a large distributed agile software development organization - Case Ericsson , 2014, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[3]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[4]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  The innovation and economic consequences of knowledge spillovers: fit between exploration and exploitation capabilities, knowledge attributes, and transfer mechanisms , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[6]  Michael Dinger,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research , 2012, MIS Q..

[7]  ZimmermannAngelika,et al.  Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships , 2014 .

[8]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research , 2013 .

[10]  Lianying Zhang,et al.  How to reduce the negative impacts of knowledge heterogeneity in engineering design team: Exploring the role of knowledge reuse , 2016 .

[11]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares , 2019, European Journal of Marketing.

[12]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[13]  Geraldo Barbosa Landre,et al.  Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review , 2017, J. Syst. Softw..

[14]  Ashatu Hussein,et al.  The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research : Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? , 2009 .

[15]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units , 2012 .

[16]  AhmadAwais,et al.  Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of barriers to process improvement in global software development , 2017 .

[17]  Christian Kreiner,et al.  Implementing Functional Safety Standards , 2015 .

[18]  Sussy Bayona Oré,et al.  Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment , 2012, Software Quality Journal.

[19]  Muhammad Ali Babar,et al.  A systematic review of knowledge sharing challenges and practices in global software development , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Claude Y. Laporte,et al.  Software Process Improvement in Very Small Organizations , 2016, IEEE Software.

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[22]  Jie Wei,et al.  The Assimilation of RFID Technology by Chinese Companies: A Technology Diffusion Perspective , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of barriers to process improvement in global software development: Client-vendor perspective , 2017, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[24]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation , 2018 .

[25]  최승호 Repeating a familiar pattern in a new way: The effect of exploitation and exploration on knowledge leverage behaviors in technology acquisitions , 2018 .

[26]  Rory V. O'Connor,et al.  Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in software development teams: An empirical study , 2013, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[27]  Hamid Tohidi,et al.  Organizational learning measurement and the effect on firm innovation , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[28]  Maeve Henchion,et al.  Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Sonja Sperber,et al.  Towards a deeper understanding of the emergence of process innovations: Which role do inter-organisational learning and internal knowledge exploitation play? , 2019, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.

[30]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[31]  Gang Peng,et al.  Healthcare IT Adoption: An Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in Socioeconomic Networks , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  S. Liao,et al.  Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning , 2017 .

[33]  Tore Dybå,et al.  An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[34]  Shahla Ghobadi,et al.  Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures , 2017, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[35]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Shared values, new vision: Collaboration and communities of practice in virtual reference and SQA , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Examining interpersonal trust as a facilitator and uncertainty as an inhibitor of intra‐organisational knowledge sharing , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[38]  Tony Gorschek,et al.  Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[39]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Shu-Mei Tseng,et al.  Investigating the moderating effects of organizational culture and leadership style on IT-adoption and knowledge-sharing intention , 2017, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Miguel Hernández-Espallardo,et al.  Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[42]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Maral Mayeh,et al.  The role of absorptive capacity, communication and trust in ERP adoption , 2016, J. Syst. Softw..

[44]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[45]  Sully Taylor,et al.  Boundaryless careers, social capital, and knowledge management: Implications for organizational performance , 2009 .

[46]  Goparaju Purna Sudhakar A model of critical success factors for software projects , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[47]  Quinetta Roberson,et al.  Transforming Research on Diversity and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective , 2017 .

[48]  Shahla Ghobadi,et al.  Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in agile software teams , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[49]  MathiassenLars,et al.  Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in agile software teams , 2016 .

[50]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  W. Olsen,et al.  Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed , 2004 .

[52]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  Seungho Choi,et al.  Repeating a familiar pattern in a new way: The effect of exploitation and exploration on knowledge leverage behaviors in technology acquisitions , 2018 .

[54]  Qing Hu,et al.  How does organisational absorptive capacity matter in the assimilation of enterprise information systems? , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[55]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  Impact of absorptive capability on software process improvement and firm performance , 2016, Information Technology and Management.

[56]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Shahla Ghobadi,et al.  What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: A literature review and classification framework , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Six sigma, absorptive capacity and organisational learning orientation , 2012 .

[59]  Rory V. O'Connor,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Software Process Adaptive Capability and Organisational Performance , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[60]  M. Tortoriello The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge , 2015 .

[61]  Yong-Hui Li,et al.  Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[62]  J. Eskildsen,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions , 2016 .

[63]  Algan Uskarc,et al.  Do staged maturity models result in organization-wide continuous process improvement? Insight from employees , 2017 .

[64]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[65]  Minhyung Kang,et al.  Multi-level analysis of knowledge transfer: a knowledge recipient's perspective , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[67]  Christof Ebert,et al.  Effectively utilizing project, product and process knowledge , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[68]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: A dynamic capability view , 2019 .

[69]  HsuMeng-Hsiang,et al.  Examining interpersonal trust as a facilitator and uncertainty as an inhibitor of intra-organisational knowledge sharing , 2014 .

[70]  Sherlock A. Licorish,et al.  Understanding the attitudes, knowledge sharing behaviors and task performance of core developers: A longitudinal study , 2014, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[71]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  The Moderator of Innovation Culture and the Mediator of Realized Absorptive Capacity in Enhancing Organizations' Absorptive Capacity for SPI Success , 2019, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[72]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  The moderating effects of organisational culture on the relationship between absorptive capacity and software process improvement success , 2017, Inf. Technol. People.

[73]  Minhyung Kang,et al.  Motivation, opportunity, and ability in knowledge transfer: a social network approach , 2017 .

[74]  Mahmood Niazi,et al.  A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors , 2015, J. Softw. Evol. Process..

[75]  Angelika Zimmermann,et al.  Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships: the roles of social capital, efficacy and outcome expectations , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[76]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  Origins and emergence of exploration and exploitation capabilities in new technology-based firms , 2017 .

[77]  Shengce Ren,et al.  Search scope and innovation performance of emerging-market firms☆ , 2015 .

[78]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How MNC's subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[79]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship between Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Learning, and a Proposed Integration , 2008 .

[80]  Alessio Ferrari,et al.  QuOD: An NLP Tool to Improve the Quality of Business Process Descriptions , 2019, From Software Engineering to Formal Methods and Tools, and Back.

[81]  Chung-Yang Chen,et al.  Investigating the environmental antecedents of organizations' intention to adopt agile software development , 2019, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..