Clustering and firm performance in project-based industries: The case of the global video game industry, 1972-2007

Explanations of spatial clustering based on localization externalities are being questioned by recent empirical evidence showing that firms in clusters do not outperform firms outside clusters. We propose that these findings may be driven by the particularities of the industrial settings chosen in these studies. We argue that in project-based industries, negative localization externalities associated with competition grow proportionally with cluster size, while positive localization externalities increase more than proportionally related to cluster size. By studying the survival patterns of 4,607 firms and 1,229 subsidiaries in the global video game industry, we find that the net effect of clustering becomes positive after a cluster reaches a critical size. We further unravel the subtleties of the video game industry by differentiating between exits by failure and exit by acquisition, and conclude that being acquired is best considered as a sign of success rather than as a business failure.

[1]  Hans-Peter Blossfeld,et al.  Event history analysis with stata , 2007 .

[2]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[3]  Oliver Ibert.  Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology , 2004 .

[4]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[5]  Denise D. Bielby,et al.  Organizational Mediation of Project-Based Labor Markets: Talent Agencies and the Careers of Screenwriters , 1999 .

[6]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? , 2006 .

[7]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography , 2011 .

[8]  J. Johns.  Video games production networks: value capture, power relations and embeddedness , 2006 .

[9]  R. Boschma,et al.  Evolutionary economics and industry location , 2003 .

[10]  M. Storper.  The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[11]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  The Anchor Tenant Hypothesis: Exploring the Role of Large, Local, R&D-Intensive Firms in Regional Innovation Systems , 2003 .

[12]  S. Appold,et al.  Location Patterns of US Industrial Research: Mimetic Isomorphism and the Emergence of Geographic Charisma , 2005 .

[13]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Performing in Dutch book publishing 1880--2008: the importance of entrepreneurial experience and the Amsterdam cluster , 2011 .

[14]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Selection and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Shipbuilding Industry, 18251914 , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[15]  David Stark,et al.  Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects , 2002 .

[16]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[17]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management: A Long-Term Research Agenda on Temporary Organizational Forms , 2011 .

[18]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational evolution in a multinational context: entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy , 1995 .

[19]  Andy C. Pratt,et al.  The Cultural Industries Production System: A Case Study of Employment Change in Britain, 1984–91 , 1997 .

[20]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[21]  Gernot Grabher.  Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? , 2004 .

[22]  O. Marsili,et al.  Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms' Survival , 2006 .

[23]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Spatial Clustering, Local Accumulation of Knowledge and Firm Competitiveness , 1996 .

[24]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 10 . 04 Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows : How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants ? , 2010 .

[25]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Disagreements, Spinoffs, and the Evolution of Detroit as the Capital of the U.S. Automobile Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[26]  F. Ted Tschang,et al.  Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Games Industry , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Fabrizio Perretti,et al.  Mixing genres and matching people: a study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood , 2007 .

[28]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Origin and Growth of Industry Clusters: The Making of Silicon Valley and Detroit , 2010 .

[29]  Ray Hudson,et al.  Thinking Through the Geographies Of the New Europe in the New Millennium , 2004 .

[30]  Udo Staber,et al.  Spatial Proximity and Firm Survival in a Declining Industrial District: The Case of Knitwear Firms in Baden-Wu¨rttemberg , 2001 .

[31]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[32]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Legitimation, Geographical Scale, and Organizational Density: Regional Patterns of Foundings of American Automobile Producers, 1885–1981 , 1997 .

[33]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[35]  Ian Richard Gordon,et al.  Duration Dependence in Migration Behaviour: Cumulative Inertia versus Stochastic Change , 1995, Environment & planning A.

[36]  Majlinda Zhegu,et al.  Anchor tenants and regional innovation systems: the aircraft industry , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[37]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[38]  Jonathan Haskel,et al.  Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival in UK Manufacturing , 2003 .

[39]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[40]  Nick Henry,et al.  Spatialising knowledge: placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley , 2000 .

[41]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007 , 2013 .

[42]  Mathijs de Vaan,et al.  Interfirm networks in periods of technological turbulence and stability , 2014 .

[43]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[44]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Geographic cluster size and firm performance , 2006 .

[45]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Recombinant Growth , 2009 .

[46]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[47]  Raphaël Suire,et al.  Why do some places succeed when others decline? A social interaction model of cluster viability , 2008 .

[48]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[49]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms , 2008 .

[50]  S. Appold,et al.  Agglomeration, Interorganizational Networks, and Competitive Performance in the U.S. Metalworking Sector , 1995 .

[51]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[52]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[53]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[54]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams , 2002 .

[55]  R. Kloosterman.  Building a Career: Labour Practices and Cluster Reproduction in Dutch Architectural Design , 2010 .

[56]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  No place like home? Relocation, capabilities, and firm survival in the German machine tool industry after World War II , 2011 .

[57]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Udo Staber,et al.  The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television , 2002 .

[59]  Michael Gort,et al.  The Evolution of Markets and Entry, Exit and Survival of Firms , 1996 .

[60]  Thomas Hellmann.  Venture Capitalists: The Coaches of Silicon Valley , 2000 .

[61]  Octávio Figueiredo,et al.  Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[62]  Rik Wenting,et al.  Spinoff dynamics and the spatial formation of the fashion design industry, 1858-2005 , 2008 .

[63]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[64]  M. Engwall.  No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[65]  A. Scott.  The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-Producing Industries , 2000 .

[66]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy , 2007 .

[67]  Andrew Tylecote,et al.  Corporate Governance, Innovation Systems and Industrial Performance , 1999 .

[68]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 04 The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry , 2005 .

[69]  H. Odagiri,et al.  Are mergers and acquisitions going to be popular in Japan too? : An empirical study , 1989 .

[70]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–19891 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  Sarah Williams,et al.  The geography of buzz: art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York , 2010 .

[72]  Tom Nicholas,et al.  Spatial Diversity in Invention: Evidence from the Early R&D Labs , 2008 .

[73]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[74]  E. Stam.  Why Butterflies Don’t Leave: Locational Behavior of Entrepreneurial Firms , 2007 .

[75]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited , 2009 .

[76]  A. Scott.  The Cultural Economy of Cities , 1997 .