Uncovering cis Regulatory Codes Using Synthetic Promoter Shuffling

Revealing the spectrum of combinatorial regulation of transcription at individual promoters is essential for understanding the complex structure of biological networks. However, the computations represented by the integration of various molecular signals at complex promoters are difficult to decipher in the absence of simple cis regulatory codes. Here we synthetically shuffle the regulatory architecture — operator sequences binding activators and repressors — of a canonical bacterial promoter. The resulting library of complex promoters allows for rapid exploration of promoter encoded logic regulation. Among all possible logic functions, NOR and ANDN promoter encoded logics predominate. A simple transcriptional cis regulatory code determines both logics, establishing a straightforward map between promoter structure and logic phenotype. The regulatory code is determined solely by the type of transcriptional regulation combinations: two repressors generate a NOR: NOT (a OR b) whereas a repressor and an activator generate an ANDN: a AND NOT b. Three-input versions of both logics, having an additional repressor as an input, are also present in the library. The resulting complex promoters cover a wide dynamic range of transcriptional strengths. Synthetic promoter shuffling represents a fast and efficient method for exploring the spectrum of complex regulatory functions that can be encoded by complex promoters. From an engineering point of view, synthetic promoter shuffling enables the experimental testing of the functional properties of complex promoters that cannot necessarily be inferred ab initio from the known properties of the individual genetic components. Synthetic promoter shuffling may provide a useful experimental tool for studying naturally occurring promoter shuffling.

[1]  Michael A. Beer,et al.  Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence , 2004, Cell.

[2]  J. Stone,et al.  Rapid evolution of cis-regulatory sequences via local point mutations. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  M Lanzer,et al.  Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Feder,et al.  Heat-Shock Promoters: Targets for Evolution by P Transposable Elements in Drosophila , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[5]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[6]  D. Relman,et al.  Significant Gene Order and Expression Differences in Bordetella pertussis Despite Limited Gene Content Variation , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Robert Schleif,et al.  AraC protein: a love-hate relationship. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[10]  E. Davidson,et al.  Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene. , 1998, Science.

[11]  J. Cronan,et al.  Long-term and homogeneous regulation of the Escherichia coli araBAD promoter by use of a lactose transporter of relaxed specificity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. King,et al.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.

[13]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  New cloning vectors for integration in the lambda attachment site attB of the Escherichia coli chromosome. , 1992, Plasmid.

[14]  R. Schleif,et al.  AraC protein can activate transcription from only one position and when pointed in only one direction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  E. Davidson Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[16]  H. Ten Have,et al.  Open Access , 2021, Dictionary of Global Bioethics.

[17]  Lee Ann McCue,et al.  Making connections between novel transcription factors and their DNA motifs. , 2005, Genome research.

[18]  D. Cooper,et al.  Promoter shuffling has occurred during the evolution of the vertebrate growth hormone gene. , 2000, Gene.

[19]  X Zhang,et al.  Transcription activation parameters at ara pBAD. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  D. Cooper,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATE β-GLOBIN GENE PROMOTER , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  D. Cooper,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATE β‐GLOBIN GENE PROMOTER , 2002 .

[22]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[23]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks , 2002, Science.

[24]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Functional determinants of transcription factors in Escherichia coli: protein families and binding sites. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  New cloning vectors for integration into the λ attachment site attB of the Escherichia coli chromosome , 1992 .

[26]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by Competing Transcription Factor Modules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  S. Carroll,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form , 2005, PLoS biology.

[28]  E. G. Estrada,et al.  The evolution of the vertebrate beta globin gene family , 2004 .