Important Drug Safety Information on the Internet

AbstractBackground: The Internet is becoming increasingly important as a source of health-related information, but the accuracy and reliability of information presented on the world wide web is debated. Objective: We aimed to assess whether important, recent drug safety information is accurately reflected on Internet sites. Methods: We evaluated whether major warnings issued by the US FDA between October 1, 2000 and September 30, 2001 on severe and life-threatening drug toxicity were mentioned 4–16 months later in the top ten web pages identified for these drugs by each of seven different search engines. We examined predictors of precise mention of the FDA warnings using logistic regressions. Results: Twenty major safety warnings on 21 drugs (including three withdrawals) were eligible for the study. Among 519 different pertinent web pages retrieved (16–32 for each drug), precise mention of the safety issue was made in only 165 (31.8%). Best rates of precise mention were seen in web sites sponsored by attorneys (79.4%), in physician-oriented web pages (65.5%) and for withdrawn drugs (57.9%). In addition to these factors, better coverage of the FDA warnings was independently seen when no other adverse effects from the same organ system was mentioned (p < 0.001), while coverage was worse when there was no date on the site and web page (p = 0.020), and when the site owner could not be classified or was unknown (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Important safety warnings are inadequately covered in the majority of web pages. This deficiency creates a source of potentially harmful misinformation for health consumers.

[1]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Standardized retrieval of side effects data for meta-analysis of safety outcomes. A feasibility study in acute sinusitis. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[3]  G Eva Nasal diamorphine in children with clinical fractures , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  R Roberts,et al.  Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J. O'connor,et al.  Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. , 2000, JAMA.

[7]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Reporting of safety data from randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  Manish Latthe,et al.  Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  D Charnock,et al.  Helping patients access high quality health information , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  S. Singletary,et al.  Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. , 2001, JAMA.

[12]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[16]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Petra Wilson,et al.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.