A gradient-based aero-stealth optimization design method for flying wing aircraft

Abstract Flying wing layout has both favorable aerodynamic performance and outstanding radar scattering characteristics, which is regarded as an ideal stealth aircraft layout. In this paper, a gradient-based aerodynamic and stealth optimization design method is established by coupling the Free-Form Deformation approach (FFD), Radial Basis Function algorithm (RBF), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Physical Optics (PO) and the Sequential Quadratic Programming algorithm (SQP). The gradient of the aerodynamic characteristic parameters could be obtained by solving the discrete adjoint equations. With PO code differentiated by the automatic differentiation tool, the Radar Cross Section (RCS) and its gradient would be collected. Based on the aero-stealth optimization design method, three kinds of optimization strategies are applied to design a certain flying wing layout aircraft: 1) The drag coefficient is chosen as the objective function while the RCS is set as a constraint condition; 2) The RCS is selected as the objective function while the drag coefficient is set as a constraint condition; 3) The objective function is composed of the drag coefficient and the RCS through the Weighted Sum method. The optimization results show that when choosing the first two strategies, the optimization algorithm would push single discipline performance to the edge. Alternatively, it would obtain several trade-off configurations when selecting the last strategy. The results demonstrate that the gradient-based aero-stealth optimization design method can deal with the multidisciplinary optimization problems which require a large number of design variables. Without a large number of function evaluations, this method could rapidly and efficiently obtain the shape that meets the requirements of aerodynamic and stealth performances.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  On the influence of optimization algorithm and initial design on wing aerodynamic shape optimization , 2018 .

[2]  Harry A. Dwyer,et al.  Shape optimization for aerodynamic efficiency and low observability , 1993 .

[3]  A. C. Woo,et al.  Benchmark radar targets for the validation of computational electromagnetics programs , 1993 .

[4]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Adaptive Morphing Trailing Edge Wing , 2014 .

[5]  Hui Wang,et al.  Aero-Structure-Stealth Coupled Optimization for High Aspect Ratio Wing Using Adaptive Metamodeling Method , 2014 .

[6]  Feng Qu,et al.  A new all-speed flux scheme for the Euler equations , 2019, Comput. Math. Appl..

[7]  D. Zingg,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Natural Laminar Flow Using a Discrete-Adjoint Approach , 2015 .

[8]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory , 1998 .

[9]  Guoqing Zhao,et al.  Integrated Optimization Analyses on Aerodynamic/Stealth Characteristics of Helicopter Rotor Based on Surrogate Model , 2014 .

[10]  W. Kyle Anderson,et al.  Adjoint-Based Shape Optimization for Electromagnetic Problems Using Discontinuous Galerkin Methods , 2011 .

[11]  V. P. Cable,et al.  Finite-volume time-domain (FVTD) techniques for EM scattering , 1991 .

[12]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Airfoil Shaping for Reduced Radar Cross Section , 1994 .

[13]  D. Kwak,et al.  Three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes solver using lower-upper symmetric-Gauss-Seidel algorithm , 1991 .

[14]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Design of a transonic wing with an adaptive morphing trailing edge via aerostructural optimization , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[15]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization Studies of a Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2014 .

[16]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Multi-objective / multidisciplinary design optimisation of blended wing body UAV via advanced evolutionary algorithms , 2007 .

[17]  P. Roache Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies , 1994 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark , 2015 .

[19]  David C. Jenn,et al.  A Matlab Physical Optics RCS Prediction Code , 2000 .

[20]  Thomas D. Economon,et al.  Stanford University Unstructured (SU 2 ): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design , 2013 .

[21]  Thomas D. Economon,et al.  Large-scale aircraft design using SU2 , 2015 .

[22]  Renfu Li,et al.  A combined criteria-based method for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction , 2018 .

[23]  J. Bai,et al.  Development of a computational fluid dynamics compatible mathematical model for boundary layer transitional flows in low-disturbance environment , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[24]  Ramy Rashad,et al.  High-Fidelity Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Natural Laminar Flow , 2016 .

[25]  Meng Chen,et al.  Numerical Optimization on Aerodynamic/Stealth Characteristics of Airfoil Based on CFD/CEM Coupling Method , 2016 .

[26]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[27]  K. Fountoulakis Higher-order methods for large-scale optimization , 2015 .

[28]  Jian Yu,et al.  Flowfield Reconstruction Method Using Artificial Neural Network , 2019, AIAA Journal.

[29]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations , 1994 .

[30]  A. Jameson,et al.  Multi-Element High-Lift Configuration Design Optimization Using Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method , 2004 .

[31]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A parallel aerostructural optimization framework for aircraft design studies , 2014 .

[32]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation , 1996 .

[33]  K. Srinivas,et al.  Aerodynamic/RCS shape optimisation of unmanned aerial vehicles using hierarchical asynchronous parallel evolutionary algorithms , 2006 .

[34]  R. Safian,et al.  Accelerated gradient based optimization using adjoint sensitivities , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[35]  Joel Brezillon,et al.  2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimisation using the adjoint approach , 2004 .

[36]  J. Samareh Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Free-form Deformation , 2004 .

[37]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Common Research Model Wing–Body–Tail Configuration , 2016 .

[38]  J. Alonso,et al.  A methodology for the development of discrete adjoint solvers using automatic differentiation tools , 2007 .

[39]  Mingxu Yi,et al.  Comprehensive optimization of aerodynamic noise and radar stealth for helicopter rotor based on Pareto solution , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[40]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[41]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A comparative evaluation of genetic and gradient-based algorithms applied to aerodynamic optimization , 2008 .

[42]  S. Glavic,et al.  Feasible adjoint sensitivity technique for EM design optimization , 2002, 2002 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.02CH37278).

[43]  H. Bijl,et al.  Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation , 2007 .

[44]  Kristian Amadori,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization of Unmanned Aircraft Considering Radar Signature, Sensors, and Trajectory Constraints , 2018, Journal of Aircraft.

[45]  Eugene F. Knott,et al.  Radar Cross Section: Its Prediction, Measurement and Reduction , 1985 .

[46]  C A Hirshman,et al.  A possible undesirable interaction of propranolol and atropine. , 1980, Anesthesiology.

[47]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of the Common Research Model Wing-Body-Tail Configuration , 2015 .

[48]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .