Flexible fusion of electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Revealing neural-hemodynamic coupling through structured matrix-tensor factorization

Simultaneous recording of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI) has gained wide interest in brain research, thanks to the highly complementary spatiotemporal nature of both modalities. We propose a novel technique to extract sources of neural activity from the multimodal measurements, which relies on a structured form of coupled matrix-tensor factorization (CMTF). In a data-symmetric fashion, we characterize these underlying sources in the spatial, temporal and spectral domain, and estimate how the observations in EEG and fMRI are related through neurovascular coupling. That is, we explicitly account for the intrinsically variable nature of this coupling, allowing more accurate localization of the neural activity in time and space. We illustrate the effectiveness of this approach, which is shown to be robust to noise, by means of a simulation study. Hence, this provides a conceptually simple, yet effective alternative to other data-driven analysis methods in event-related or resting-state EEG-fMRI studies.

[1]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Single-Trial Variability in Event-Related BOLD Signals , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jose M. Sanchez-Bornot,et al.  Model driven EEG/fMRI fusion of brain oscillations , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  Jean Gotman,et al.  The BOLD Response to Interictal Epileptiform Discharges , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Fumikazu Miwakeichi,et al.  Concurrent EEG/fMRI analysis by multiway Partial Least Squares , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Joint Blind Source Separation by Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Martin M. Monti,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[9]  Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa,et al.  Tensor Analysis and Fusion of Multimodal Brain Images , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Data-driven HRF estimation for encoding and decoding models , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[13]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Understanding data fusion within the framework of coupled matrix and tensor factorizations , 2013 .

[14]  Lieven De Lathauwer,et al.  Structured Data Fusion , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[15]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions: A New Concept in Brain Data Analysis? , 2013, ArXiv.

[16]  A. Villringer,et al.  Simultaneous EEG–fMRI , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: Efficiency, bias and mis-modeling , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Tensor decompositions and data fusion in epileptic electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 2017, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..