IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs

A fundamental result of the information technology (IT) and business performance literature is that IT is not a driver of performance per se. However, it can be associated with higher performance if accompanied by organizational change. The identification of the variables describing organizational change is still on-going work. This paper focuses on organizational absorptive capacity and analyses its effects on the relationship between IT and business performance in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Organizational absorptive capacity measures the ability of an organization to complete a learning process. A significant learning effort is typically associated with IT, as it represents a complex technology. To cope with IT's complexity, implementation is typically incremental and is accompanied by a continuous integration effort of data and applications. The degree of integration of a company's information system (IS), called IS integration, is a proxy of IT maturity and quality. In this study, we explore the effect of IS integration on business performance through absorptive capacity, that is, we hypothesize that absorptive capacity has a mediation role between IS integration and business performance. The proposed research model is tested with data surveyed from 466 SMEs sited in Italy, for which exports constitute more than half of their revenues. Results indicate that organizational absorptive capacity has a mediation effect. Alternative models attributing to absorptive capacity a role different from mediation are found to be non-significant.

[1]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[2]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  D. Upton Process range in manufacturing: an empirical study of flexibility , 1997 .

[5]  D. Teece Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 2004 .

[6]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[7]  K. Kraemer,et al.  : Evidence from , 2022 .

[8]  Hamid Pirahesh,et al.  Information integration: A research agenda , 2002, IBM Syst. J..

[9]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Emergence of ERPII Characteristics within an ERP Integration Context , 2005, AMCIS.

[10]  David Upton,et al.  Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing , 1995 .

[11]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[12]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[13]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[14]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information Technology at Rosenbluth Travel: Competitive Advantage in a Rapidly Growing Global Service Company , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[16]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..

[17]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[18]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[19]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information Technology and the Management Difference: A Fusion Map , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[20]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility , 1999 .

[22]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[23]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[26]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[29]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Information system integration , 2000, CACM.

[30]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[31]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[32]  NG J.K.C.,et al.  A paradigm for ERP and BPR integration , 2003 .

[33]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[35]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[36]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[37]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  Manufacturing Practices and Strategy Integration: Effects on Cost Efficiency, Flexibility, and Market-Based Performance , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[38]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[39]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[40]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  An Integrative Framework for the Assimilation of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Phases, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[41]  S. Winter Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[42]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Information Technology and Worker Composition: Determinants of Productivity in the Life Insurance Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[43]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[44]  Leslie Will cocks It evaluation: Managing the catch 22 , 1992 .

[45]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[46]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[47]  Thomas F. Gattiker,et al.  Understanding the local-level costs and benefits of ERP through organizational information processing theory , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Leaders Assess the Current State of the Academic IS Discipline , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: ERP adoption by European midsize companies , 2000, CACM.

[51]  Diane Wilson Assessing the impact of information technology on organizational performance , 1993 .

[52]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly , 1996, Oper. Res..

[53]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  TELCOT: An Application of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage in the Cotton Industry , 1990, MIS Q..

[54]  R. Caves Industrial Organization, Corporate Strategy and Structure , 1980 .

[55]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[56]  P. Shrivastava A TYPOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[57]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[58]  Anne Powell,et al.  The ERP Purchase Decision: Influential Business and IT Factors , 2000 .

[59]  J. Michael Pearson,et al.  E-Commerce Adoption: Perceptions of Managers/Owners of Small and Medium Sized Firms in Chile , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[61]  Robert A. Atkinson CAPTURING THE FULL IMPACT OF IT , 1991 .

[62]  R. M. Hall,et al.  A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage , 1993 .

[63]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Michael Aiken,et al.  Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies , 1980 .

[65]  Bandula Jayatilaka,et al.  Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature , 2004, DATB.

[66]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  McKesson Drug Company: A Case Study of Economost - A Strategic Information System , 1988, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  D. Siegel The Impact of Computers on Manufacturing Productivity Growth: A Multiple-Indicators, Multiple-Causes Approach , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[68]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[69]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[70]  G. Day Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage , 1984 .

[71]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy At First American Corporation , 2000, MIS Q..

[72]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Heather A. Smith,et al.  How Does Information Technology Affect Business Value? A Reassessment and Research Propositions , 2009 .

[74]  D. Robey Computers and Management Structure: Some Empirical Findings Re-examined , 1977 .

[75]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[76]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Matrix of Change , 1997 .

[77]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[78]  Clive Holtham,et al.  The Business Value of Computers , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[79]  R. Dewar,et al.  Elite Values Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation , 1973 .

[80]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  ERP Adoption by European Midsize Companies. , 2000 .

[81]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[82]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .

[83]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[84]  A. Krueger How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984-1989 , 1991 .

[85]  E. Carmines,et al.  Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures , 1981 .

[86]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[87]  L. Willcocks,et al.  In search of information technology productivity: Assessment issues , 1997 .

[88]  Keng Siau,et al.  Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI , 2003, CACM.

[89]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[90]  Ben Light,et al.  Focus issue on legacy information systems and busines process engineering: a business perspective of legacy information systems , 1999 .

[91]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  The Evolution of EDI for Competitive Advantage: The Fedex Case , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[92]  Ben Light,et al.  Focus Issue on Legacy Information Systems and Business Process Change: A Business Perspective of Legacy Information Systems , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[93]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[94]  Gregory G. Dess Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry , 1987 .

[95]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[96]  Seemantini Madhukar Pathak,et al.  A THEMATIC ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY RESEARCH , 2002 .

[97]  Varun Grover,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance , 1994, MIS Q..

[98]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Refining and Extending the Business Model with Information Technology: Dell Computer Corporation , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[99]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[100]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Ultra-high-density data storage: introduction , 2000, CACM.

[101]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[102]  S. Snell,et al.  THE STRATEGIC USE OF INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1996 .

[103]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .