Characterization of Automotive Paint Clear Coats by Ultraviolet Absorption Microspectrophotometry with Subsequent Chemometric Analysis

Clear coats have been a staple in automobile paints for almost thirty years and are of forensic interest when comparing transferred and native paints. However, the ultraviolet (UV) absorbers in these paint layers are not typically characterized using UV microspectrophotometry, nor are the results studied using multivariate statistical methods. In this study, measurements were carried out by UV microspectrophotometry on 71 samples from American and Australian automobiles, with subsequent chemometric analysis of the absorbance spectra. Sample preparation proved to be vital in obtaining accurate absorbance spectra and a method involving peeling the clear coat layer and not using a mounting medium was preferred. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering indicated three main groups of spectra, corresponding to spectra with one, two, and three maxima. Principal components analysis confirmed this clustering and the factor loadings indicated that a substantial proportion of the variance in the data set originated from specific spectral regions (230–265 nm, 275–285 nm, and 300–370 nm). The three classes were well differentiated using discriminant analysis, where the cross-validation accuracy was 91.6% and the external validation accuracy was 81.1%. However, results showed no correlation between the make, model, and year of the automobiles.

[1]  J. Bentley,et al.  Composition, manufacture and use of paint , 2001 .

[2]  E. Roginsky,et al.  CoAT , 2001, Integrating Arts Therapies into Education.

[3]  J. Miller,et al.  Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry , 2005 .

[4]  Richard Kramer,et al.  Chemometric Techniques For Quantitative Analysis , 1998 .

[5]  D. R. Cousins,et al.  The use of microspectrophotometry for the identification of pigments in small paint samples , 1984 .

[6]  H. Fujiwara,et al.  The examination of UV-absorbers in 2-coat metallic and non-metallic automotive paints. , 1999, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  G. Edmondstone,et al.  An Assessment of the Evidential Value of Automotive Paint Comparisons , 2004 .

[8]  D. Thorburn Burns,et al.  The discrimination of automotive clear coat paints indistinguishable by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy via pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , 2005 .

[9]  Grzegorz Zadora,et al.  Differentiation and evaluation of evidence value of styrene acrylic urethane topcoat car paints analysed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  Randall D. Tobias,et al.  Chemometrics: A Practical Guide , 1998, Technometrics.

[11]  S Ryland,et al.  Discrimination of 1990s original automotive paint systems: a collaborative study of black nonmetallic base coat/clear coat finishes using infrared spectroscopy. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  B. Plage,et al.  The discrimination of automotive clear coats by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and comparison of samples by a chromatogram library software. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[13]  D. Thorburn Burns,et al.  A comparison of pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the characterisation of automative paint samples , 2005 .

[14]  K. Dušek,et al.  Scratch- and mar-resistant refinish two-pack clear coats — linear versus branched acrylics , 2006 .

[15]  A. Beveridge,et al.  Use of infrared spectroscopy for the characterisation of paint fragments , 2001 .

[16]  Edward G. Bartick,et al.  Discrimination of Forensic Analytical Chemical Data Using Multivariate Statistics , 2007 .

[17]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry , 2004, Technometrics.