Mobility Policies and Extra-Small Projects for Improving Mobility of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder

The paper focuses on the relationship between cities and people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Specifically, this research aims to provide practical guidelines on how to design urban policies and urban design projects, such that they improve the capabilities of people with ASD to walk across the city and access relevant public urban spaces and facilities. Although this is a well-defined field of research, this paper should be seen as a contribution to the debate on the understanding of disability as a product of processes of human-environment interaction and as an attempt to address issues of mobility for people with disabilities by taking into account their personal characteristics and capabilities. Current methodological and operational efforts on the role of spatial configuration as a means for improving the autonomy of people with ASD focus almost exclusively on the design of closed, separated, private spaces, devoted only to people with ASD (mainly children). Starting from these considerations, the paper describes a research project aimed at defining an integrated set of urban mobility policies and extra-small urban design projects to provide people with ASD a real opportunity of using their city.

[1]  O. Bogdashina.  Sensory Perceptual Issues in Autism and Asperger Syndrome: Different Sensory Experiences - Different Perceptual Worlds , 2003 .

[2]  Iain Scott,et al.  Designing learning spaces for children on the autism spectrum , 2009 .

[3]  L. Goldberg.  for Children with Autism and Special Needs , 2015 .

[4]  S. Alkire.  Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction , 2002 .

[5]  C. Basta.  On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach , 2017 .

[6]  Magda Mostafa.  An Architecture for Autism: Built Environment Performance in Accordance to the Autism ASPECTSS™ Design Index , 2015 .

[7]  P. Aldhous.  Breaking the mould , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Valentina Talu.  Qualità della vita urbana e approccio delle capacità , 2013 .

[9]  Magda Mostafa,et al.  AN ARCHITECTURE FOR AUTISM: CONCEPTS OF DESIGN INTERVENTION FOR THE AUTISTIC USER , 2008 .

[10]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  Evaluating walkability: a capability-wise planning and design support system , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Otto Bird.  The Idea of Justice , 1967 .

[12]  C. Basta.  From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach , 2016 .

[13]  S. Ahrentzen,et al.  At Home with Autism: Designing Housing for the Spectrum , 2016 .

[14]  Bonnie Barnes Hebert.  Design guidelines of a therapeutic garden for autistic children , 2003 .

[15]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Women and Equality: The Capabilities Approach , 1999 .

[16]  H. Gross,et al.  Women and Equality. , 1978 .

[17]  Alexandre Apsan Frediani,et al.  Sen's Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development , 2010 .

[18]  André Brand,et al.  Living in the Community Housing Design for Adults with Autism , 2010 .

[19]  Ivan Blecic,et al.  Approccio delle capacità e pianificazione urbana. Capacità urbane feconde e qualità della vita urbana degli abitanti più svantaggiati , 2018, ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI.

[20]  D. Gasper,et al.  Approaching Development Projects from a Human Development and Capability Perspective , 2014 .

[21]  I. Robeyns.  Conceptualising well-being for autistic persons , 2016, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[22]  M. Nussbaum.  Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach , 2011 .

[23]  Lorella Terzi.  Measuring Justice: What metric of justice for disabled people? Capability and disability , 2010 .

[24]  Luke Hillson,et al.  Tactical Urbanism – Short-term action for long-term change , 2016 .

[25]  M. Mostafavi,et al.  Integration of the social environment in a mobility ontology for people with motor disabilities , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.