Decoding Attention Position Based on Shifted Receptive Field in Visual Cortex

Visual attention is an important issue in the field of neuroscience and computer vision. According to recent research of visual cognitive computation, receptive fields are thought to be shifted with the influence of spatial attention. In the traditional method, researchers decoded various positions of attention based on constant population receptive field (pRF) parameters. Comparing with previous attention decoding researches, recent discovery may help improve the decoding accuracy. In this research, to get a better accuracy, a new decoding method is proposed with introducing the shift of pRF parameters. Firstly, we adopted two-dimensional Gaussian receptive field model to characterize the population receptive field(pRF) of each voxel in seven visual areas [V1-V4, inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), posterior fusiform gyrus (pFus), and mid-fusiform gyrus (mFus)]. Then, we introduced a parameter to measure the shift of pRF. With the shifted pRF parameters, the attention position could be decoded by maximum likelihood estimation. With published fMRI dataset, a better decoding accuracy could be obtained in most regions, especially in higher regions. The result also indicated that with the modulation of spatial attention, pRF parameters of voxels in high regions were shifted much more than those in early regions.

[1]  J. Gallant,et al.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity , 2008, Nature.

[2]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[3]  John T. Serences,et al.  Attention modulates spatial priority maps in the human occipital, parietal and frontal cortices , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Tomoyasu Horikawa,et al.  Preserved position information in high-level visual cortex with large receptive fields , 2016 .

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Attraction of Position Preference by Spatial Attention throughout Human Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.

[8]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Activation patterns in visual cortex reveal receptive field size-dependent attentional modulation , 2008, Brain Research.

[9]  Kendrick N. Kay,et al.  Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2015, Current Biology.

[10]  J. Gallant,et al.  Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies , 2011, Current Biology.

[11]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Spatial properties of objects predict patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. Heeger,et al.  Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Serences,et al.  Spatial attention improves the quality of population codes in human visual cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Sidney R. Lehky,et al.  Attention Effects on Neural Population Representations for Shape and Location Are Stronger in the Ventral than Dorsal Stream , 2018, eNeuro.

[15]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[16]  Thomas C. Sprague,et al.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Franco Pestilli,et al.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[18]  Tomoyasu Horikawa,et al.  Position Information Encoded by Population Activity in Hierarchical Visual Areas , 2017, eNeuro.