Reliability and statistical power analysis of cortical and subcortical FreeSurfer metrics in a large sample of healthy elderly

FreeSurfer is a tool to quantify cortical and subcortical brain anatomy automatically and noninvasively. Previous studies have reported reliability and statistical power analyses in relatively small samples or only selected one aspect of brain anatomy. Here, we investigated reliability and statistical power of cortical thickness, surface area, volume, and the volume of subcortical structures in a large sample (N=189) of healthy elderly subjects (64+ years). Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of cortical and subcortical parameters is generally high (cortical: ICCs>0.87, subcortical: ICCs>0.95). Surface-based smoothing increases reliability of cortical thickness maps, while it decreases reliability of cortical surface area and volume. Nevertheless, statistical power of all measures benefits from smoothing. When aiming to detect a 10% difference between groups, the number of subjects required to test effects with sufficient power over the entire cortex varies between cortical measures (cortical thickness: N=39, surface area: N=21, volume: N=81; 10mm smoothing, power=0.8, α=0.05). For subcortical regions this number is between 16 and 76 subjects, depending on the region. We also demonstrate the advantage of within-subject designs over between-subject designs. Furthermore, we publicly provide a tool that allows researchers to perform a priori power analysis and sensitivity analysis to help evaluate previously published studies and to design future studies with sufficient statistical power.

[1]  Anbupalam Thalamuthu,et al.  Distinct Genetic Influences on Cortical and Subcortical Brain Structures , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Increased cortical surface area of the left planum temporale in musicians facilitates the categorization of phonetic and temporal speech sounds , 2013, Cortex.

[4]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Comparing manual and automatic segmentation of hippocampal volumes: Reliability and validity issues in younger and older brains , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[5]  D. Stuss,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience. , 1993, Current opinion in neurobiology.

[6]  John Suckling,et al.  Are power calculations useful? A multicentre neuroimaging study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[7]  A. Dale,et al.  Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[8]  A. Lundervold,et al.  High-expanding cortical regions in human development and evolution are related to higher intellectual abilities. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Heritability of head motion during resting state functional MRI in 462 healthy twins , 2014, NeuroImage.

[10]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[11]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Real‐time optical motion correction for diffusion tensor imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Plasticity and Imaging Research in Healthy Aging: Core Ideas and Profile of the International Normal Aging and Plasticity Imaging Center (INAPIC) , 2011, Gerontology.

[13]  Markus H. Sneve,et al.  The Roots of Alzheimer's Disease: Are High-Expanding Cortical Areas Preferentially Targeted?†. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[15]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Age-associated alterations in cortical gray and white matter signal intensity and gray to white matter contrast , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  David F Abbott,et al.  Sample size estimates for well‐powered cross‐sectional cortical thickness studies , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests. , 1986 .

[19]  N. Raz,et al.  Differential Aging of the Brain: Patterns, Cognitive Correlates and Modifiers , 2022 .

[20]  Bradford C. Dickerson,et al.  Biomarker-based prediction of progression in MCI: Comparison of AD signature and hippocampal volume with spinal fluid amyloid-β and tau , 2013, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[21]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct genetic influences on cortical surface area and cortical thickness. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Validation of FreeSurfer-Estimated Brain Cortical Thickness: Comparison with Histologic Measurements , 2014, Neuroinformatics.

[24]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Test–retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  I. Melle,et al.  Cortical Volume, Surface Area, and Thickness in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  NeuroVault.org: A web database for sharing statistical parametric maps , 2013 .

[27]  Anderson M. Winkler,et al.  Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Brain size, sex, and the aging brain , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Shantanu H. Joshi,et al.  The contribution of genes to cortical thickness and volume , 2011, Neuroreport.

[31]  A. Dale,et al.  Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: The effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: A robust approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[36]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[38]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[39]  Andreas Engvig,et al.  Effects of memory training on cortical thickness in the elderly , 2010, NeuroImage.

[40]  Gregory McCarthy,et al.  Scan–rescan reliability of subcortical brain volumes derived from automated segmentation , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[41]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates , 2015, NeuroImage.

[42]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[44]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths , 2009, NeuroImage.

[45]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Spatiotemporal Linear Mixed Effects Modeling for the Mass-univariate Analysis of Longitudinal Neuroimage Data ⁎ for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 , 2022 .

[46]  Larson J. Hogstrom,et al.  The structure of the cerebral cortex across adult life: age-related patterns of surface area, thickness, and gyrification. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  G. Cumming,et al.  The New Statistics , 2014, Psychological science.

[48]  A. Dale,et al.  Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease , 2002, Neurology.

[49]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Allan Donner,et al.  Testing the equality of dependent intraclass correlation coefficients , 2002 .

[51]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  A comparison of voxel and surface based cortical thickness estimation methods , 2011, NeuroImage.

[52]  Claude Lepage,et al.  Mapping reliability in multicenter MRI: Voxel‐based morphometry and cortical thickness , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[53]  Ingrid Agartz,et al.  A common MECP2 haplotype associates with reduced cortical surface area in humans in two independent populations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Marianna D. Eddy,et al.  Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia , 2003, Schizophrenia Research.

[55]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Cortical surface area and cortical thickness demonstrate differential structural asymmetry in auditory-related areas of the human cortex. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  BrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[57]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  A comparison between voxel-based cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry in normal aging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[58]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[59]  A. Dale,et al.  The Genetic Association Between Neocortical Volume and General Cognitive Ability Is Driven by Global Surface Area Rather Than Thickness. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  Giovanni B. Frisoni,et al.  Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: A comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[61]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Longitudinal reliability of tract‐based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[62]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived cortical and subcortical morphometric measures: Effects of pulse sequence, voxel geometry, and parallel imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[63]  Allan Donner,et al.  Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results , 2004 .

[64]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[65]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[66]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Detection of cortical thickness correlates of cognitive performance: Reliability across MRI scan sessions, scanners, and field strengths , 2008, NeuroImage.

[67]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[68]  K. Mills,et al.  Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development , 2014, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  Mohamed Shoukri,et al.  Sample size requirements for the design of a reliability study , 2003 .

[70]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Mapping cortical change across the human life span , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[71]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.