Amplitudes, polarity and time of peaks of strong ground motion during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake

Plots of smoothed contours of peak amplitudes and of areas with the same peak sign are presented for the radial, transverse and vertical components of acceleration, velocity and displacement. These were drawn by hand based on strong motion recordings, and represent direct observational evidence of the nature of the attenuation of strong motion with distance at high, intermediate and low frequencies. The contours of peak amplitudes indicate that, close to the source, those are affected by the source radiation pattern, and away from the source, by the geological structure. Slower attenuation of peak amplitudes with distance is observed for waves travelling through the sediments of the Los Angeles basin. Large areas with consistent peak polarity are observed, often tens of kilometers in size, indicating that the sign of the peak is not random. The time of the peak amplitude, relative to first arrivals of S-waves, was also calculated; the areas where this time was greater than 7 s were contoured and shaded, indicating peak occurrence later than the direct arrivals from the source. These plots show that, at distances larger than about 20–30 km, for acceleration, the largest peak occurs mostly before, and, for displacement, mostly after the arrival of surface waves. This indicates that the attenuation of strong ground motion is governed by body waves at short periods and by surface waves at long periods. The presented plots will be useful in refinement of attenuation laws for ground motion peak amplitudes, and for frequency dependent response spectrum ordinates.

[1]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of red-tagged buildings versus peak horizontal velocity and intensity of shaking , 1997 .

[2]  M. Trifunac How to model amplification of strong earthquake motions by local soil and geologic site conditions , 1990 .

[3]  Stewart w. Smith,et al.  Analysis of the El Centro differential array for the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake , 1982 .

[4]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Hazard mapping of normalized peak strain in soils during earthquakes: microzonation of a metropolitan area , 1996 .

[5]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Response Spectra of Earthquake Ground Motion , 1978 .

[6]  A. Shakal,et al.  CSMP strong-motion records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[7]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A note on distribution of uncorrected peak ground accelerations during the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[8]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[9]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Peak velocities and peak surface strains during Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1996 .

[10]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Distribution of Pseudo Spectral Velocity during the Northridge, California.earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1997 .

[11]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion , 1996 .

[12]  R. F. Yerkes,et al.  Geology of the Los Angeles Basin, California: an introduction , 1965 .

[13]  D. E. Fogelson,et al.  Review of criteria for estimating damage to residences from blasting vibrations , 1962 .

[14]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Frequency dependent attenuation of strong earthquake ground motion , 1990 .

[15]  M. Trifunac Dependence of Fourier spectrum amplitudes of recorded earthquake accelerations on magnitude, local soil conditions and on depth of sediments , 1989 .

[16]  R. P. Maley,et al.  Accelerograms recorded at USGS National Strong-Motion Network stations during the Ms=6.6 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1994 .

[17]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS, and leveling data , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al.  Spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion: non-parametric estimation , 1995 .

[19]  Charles F. Richter,et al.  Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration , 1942 .

[20]  Mihailo D. Trifunac PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE PEAKS OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION--DEPENDENCE OF PEAKS ON EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE, EPICENTRAL DISTANCE, AND RECORDING SITE CONDITIONS , 1976 .

[21]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Nonlinear Soil Response— 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake , 1996 .

[22]  M. Trifunac,et al.  Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier Amplitude Spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source-to-station distance, and recording site conditions , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[23]  M. Trifunac,et al.  RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR DIFFERENTIAL MOTION OF COLUMNS , 1997 .

[24]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of pipe breaks and surface strains , 1997 .