Opto‐electrical modelling and optimization study of a novel IBC c‐Si solar cell

Interdigitated back contact (IBC) crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells are attracting a lot of attention because of their capability to reach world record conversion efficiency. Because of the relatively complex contact pattern, their design and optimization typically require advanced numerical simulation tools. In this work, a TCAD-based simulation platform has been developed to account accurately and in detail the optical and passivation mechanisms of front texturization. Its validation has been carried out with respect to a novel homo-junction IBC c-Si solar cell based on ion implantation and epitaxial growth, comparing measured and simulated reflectance, transmittance, internal quantum efficiency, external quantum efficiency spectra, and current density–voltage characteristics. As a result of the calibration process, the opto-electrical losses of the investigated device have been identified quantitatively and qualitatively. Then, an optimization study about the optimal front surface field (FSF) doping, front-side texturing morphology, and rear side geometry has been performed. The proposed simulation platform can be potentially deployed to model other solar cell architectures than homo-junction IBC devices (e.g., passivated emitter rear cell, passivated emitter rear locally diffused cell, hetero-IBC cell). Simulation results show that a not-smoothed pyramid-textured front interface and an optimal FSF doping are mandatory to minimize both the optical and the recombination losses in the considered IBC cell and, consequently, to maximize the conversion efficiency. Similarly, it has been showed that recombination losses are affected more by the doping profile rather than the surface smoothing. Moreover, the performed investigation reveals that the optimal FSF doping is almost independent from the front texturing morphology and FSF passivation quality. According to this result, it has been demonstrated that an IBC cell featuring an optimal FSF doping does not exhibit a significant efficiency improvement when the FSF passivation quality strongly improves, proving that IBC cell designs based on low-doped FSF require a very outstanding passivation quality to be competitive. Deploying an optimization algorithm, the adoption of an optimized rear side geometry can potentially lead to an efficiency improvement of about 1%abs as compared with the reference IBC solar cell. Further, by improving both emitter and c-Si bulk quality, a 22.84% efficient solar cell for 280-μm thick c-Si bulk was simulated. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  F. Granek,et al.  Positive effects of front surface field in high-efficiency back-contact back-junction n-type silicon solar cells , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[2]  Heiko Steinkemper,et al.  Input Parameters for the Simulation of Silicon Solar Cells in 2014 , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[4]  Hele Savin,et al.  High‐efficiency black silicon interdigitated back contacted solar cells on p‐type and n‐type c‐Si substrates , 2015 .

[5]  P. Altermatt,et al.  Reassessment of the intrinsic carrier density in crystalline silicon in view of band-gap narrowing , 2003 .

[6]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  2D-Modeling and Development of Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cells on Low-Cost Substrates , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[7]  Andreas Schenk,et al.  Finite-temperature full random-phase approximation model of band gap narrowing for silicon device simulation , 1998 .

[8]  Hee‐eun Song,et al.  Simulation of interdigitated back contact solar cell with trench structure , 2015 .

[9]  C. Ballif,et al.  Modification of textured silicon wafer surface morphology for fabrication of heterojunction solar cell with open circuit voltage over 700 mV , 2009, 2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[10]  David D. Smith,et al.  Generation 3: Improved performance at lower cost , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[11]  F. Granek,et al.  Back‐contacted back‐junction n‐type silicon solar cells featuring an insulating thin film for decoupling charge carrier collection and metallization geometry , 2012 .

[12]  Jürgen Schumacher,et al.  Numerical modeling of highly doped Si:P emitters based on Fermi–Dirac statistics and self-consistent material parameters , 2002 .

[13]  K. McIntosh,et al.  3-D Simulation of Interdigitated-Back-Contact Silicon Solar Cells With Quokka Including Perimeter Losses , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[14]  F. Granek,et al.  Loss Analysis of High-Efficiency Back-Contact Back-Junction Silicon Solar Cells , 2008 .

[15]  Ximello Quiebras,et al.  Wet chemical textures for crystalline silicon solar cells , 2013 .

[16]  Miro Zeman,et al.  Simplified process for high efficiency, self-aligned IBC c-Si solar cells combining ion implantation and epitaxial growth: Design and fabrication , 2016 .

[17]  K. McIntosh,et al.  Near-infrared free carrier absorption in heavily doped silicon , 2014 .

[18]  Stuart Wenham,et al.  Ray-tracing of arbitrary surface textures for light-trapping in thin silicon solar cells , 1997 .

[19]  G. Chen,et al.  Optimized Wet Processes and PECVD for High-Efficiency Solar Cells , 2012 .

[20]  C. Fiegna,et al.  Loss analysis of silicon solar cells by means of numerical device simulation , 2013, 2013 14th International Conference on Ultimate Integration on Silicon (ULIS).

[21]  V. Moroz,et al.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of the optical behavior of textured silicon wafers , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[22]  M. Zeman,et al.  Nano‐cones on micro‐pyramids: modulated surface textures for maximal spectral response and high‐efficiency solar cells , 2015 .

[23]  J. Fossum,et al.  Carrier recombination and lifetime in highly doped silicon , 1983 .

[24]  C. Fiegna,et al.  Numerical simulation of the impact of design parameters on the performance of back-contact back-junction solar cell , 2016 .

[25]  Kyotaro Nakamura,et al.  Development of Heterojunction Back Contact Si Solar Cells , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[26]  Enrico Sangiorgi,et al.  Analysis of the impact of geometrical and technological parameters on recombination losses in interdigitated back-contact solar cells , 2015 .

[27]  Pierre J. Verlinden,et al.  Design, fabrication and characterisation of a 24.4% efficient interdigitated back contact solar cell , 2016 .

[28]  D.B.M. Klaassen,et al.  A unified mobility model for device simulation—I. Model equations and concentration dependence , 1992 .

[29]  Naoteru Matsubara,et al.  Achievement of More Than 25% Conversion Efficiency With Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[30]  Pietro P. Altermatt,et al.  Models for numerical device simulations of crystalline silicon solar cells—a review , 2011 .

[31]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  Device optimization for screen printed interdigitated back contact solar cells , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[32]  C. Fiegna,et al.  Open issues for the numerical simulation of silicon solar cells , 2011, Ulis 2011 Ultimate Integration on Silicon.

[33]  Marc Rüdiger,et al.  Modeling and optimization study of industrial n-type high-efficiency back-contact back-junction silicon solar cells , 2010 .

[34]  S. Glunz,et al.  Improved quantitative description of Auger recombination in crystalline silicon , 2012 .

[35]  G. Bunea,et al.  Silicon solar cells with total area efficiency above 25 % , 2016, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).