Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents

The medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in early childhood has been criticized by patients’ advocates as well as bioethicists from an ethical point of view. Some call for a moratorium of any feminizing or masculinizing operations before the age of consent except for medical emergencies. No exhaustive ethical guidelines have been published until now. In particular, the role of the parents as legal representatives of the child is controversial. In the article, we develop, discuss, and present ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of intersex/DSD in children and adolescents. We specify three basic ethical principles that have to be respected and substantiate them. The article includes a critical discussion of the best interest of the child and of family privacy. The argumentation draws upon recommendations by the working group “Bioethics and Intersex” within the German Network DSD/Intersex, which are presented in detail. Unlike other recommendations with regard to intersex, these guidelines represent a comprehensive view of the perspectives of clinicians, patients, and their families.ConclusionThe working group identified three leading ethical principles that apply to DSD management: (1) to foster the well-being of the child and the future adult, (2) to uphold the rights of children and adolescents to participate in and/or self-determine decisions that affect them now or later, and (3) to respect the family and parent–child relationships. Nine recommendations for the management of DSD indicate how these ethical principles can spelled out and balanced against each other in the clinical setting.

[1]  K. Zucker Intersexuality and gender identity differentiation. , 1999, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[2]  Peter A. Lee,et al.  Medical treatment of intersex: parental perspectives. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J. Money,et al.  Hermaphroditism: recommendations concerning assignment of sex, change of sex and psychologic management. , 1955, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[4]  H. Beh,et al.  The Right to Be Wrong: Sex and Gender Decisions , 2006 .

[5]  K. Ford "First, do no harm"--the fiction of legal parental consent to genital-normalizing surgery on intersexed infants. , 2001, Yale law & policy review.

[6]  M. Diamond,et al.  Sex reassignment at birth. Long-term review and clinical implications. , 1997, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

[7]  Ellen K. Feder,et al.  Health care professionals and intersex conditions. , 2004, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  M. Diamond Sex, gender, and identity over the years: a changing perspective. , 2004, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[9]  S. Sytsma Ethics and Intersex , 2006 .

[10]  G. Petsko The right to be wrong , 2008, Genome Biology.

[11]  H. Mchaffie Children, Families, and Health Care Decision-making , 2000 .

[12]  E. Jesudason,et al.  Occult intraspinal glass injury , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood.

[13]  V. Larcher,et al.  Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) , 2003, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[14]  L. Kopelman The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. , 1997, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[15]  C. Chase Surgical Progress Is Not the Answer to Intersexuality , 1998, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[16]  E. Martin Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie , 1909 .

[17]  J. Hughes,et al.  First Do No Harm: Adverse Effects of Grouping Deviant Youth for Skills Training , 1999 .

[18]  S. Kleinert,et al.  Changing perspective , 2000, The Lancet.

[19]  J. Frader,et al.  Ethics and the Management of the Patient with Intersex: A Middle Way , 2001, Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM.

[20]  Eric Puybaret,et al.  Universal Declaration of Human Rights , 2006 .

[21]  U. Thyen,et al.  Deciding on Gender in Children with Intersex Conditions , 2005, Treatments in endocrinology.

[22]  M. Diamond,et al.  Management of intersexuality. Guidelines for dealing with persons with ambiguous genitalia. , 1998, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[23]  M. Diamond,et al.  Long-term Review and Clinical Implications , 2010 .

[24]  E. Susman,et al.  Informed consent in children and adolescents: age, maturation and psychological state. , 1995, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[25]  C. Chase,et al.  What is the Agenda of the Intersex Patient Advocacy Movement , 2003 .

[26]  B. Cranston Children, Families, and Health Care Decision-Making , 2003 .

[27]  T. Krones Claudia Wiesemann (2006) Von der Verantwortung, ein Kind zu bekommen. Eine Ethik der Elternschaft , 2006, Ethik in der Medizin.

[28]  J. Benjamin Sex reassignment at birth. , 1997, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[29]  A. Kon Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality , 2006 .

[30]  J. Morsink,et al.  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent , 1999 .

[31]  E. Parens Surgically Shaping Children , 2006 .

[32]  H. Beh,et al.  Changes in the management of children with intersex conditions , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology &Metabolism.

[33]  M. Diamond,et al.  Pediatric Ethics and the Surgical Assignment of Sex , 1998, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[34]  J. Money,et al.  Ablatio penis: Normal male infant sex-reassigned as a girl , 1975, Archives of sexual behavior.

[35]  S. Ahmed,et al.  Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders , 2006, Pediatrics.