Evaluation of the Environmental Engineering Study Programme at University

Abstract The European Union has placed competence-based teaching and competence-based education as one of its highly relevant goals. Due to mass higher education, the assessment of effectiveness and relevance evaluation of environmental engineering study programmes should become an important issue. Presently the focus of the evaluation on multi-disciplinary study programmes varies from the evaluation of attitudes, impacts or effectiveness of utilisation-focused evaluation, summative evaluation and participatory evaluation approaches. The objective of this study was to propose an effective framework to evaluate the Environmental Engineering Master study programmes. During the research, the evaluation of existing study programmes on environmental engineering in Europe was conducted, information about the study courses, teaching methods, assessment methods and competences was used for the analysis. The results obtained showed that lectures, site visits, group coursework, practical laboratories and role-plays allows to reach the necessary knowledge, skills and competences and to provide an effective and relevant education to the Environmental Engineering Master programme students. The proposed evaluation framework was tested and approbated on new Riga Technical University Master study programmes on Environmental Engineering and Bioeconomy.

[1]  Mark Goh,et al.  Multi-criterion models for higher education administration , 1996 .

[2]  Helen E. Higson,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in higher education , 2006 .

[3]  Daphne Goldman,et al.  Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training in Israel: Environmental Behavior of New Students , 2006 .

[4]  Jelle Boeve-de Pauw,et al.  Evaluating the Implementation Process of Environmental Education in Preservice Teacher Education: Two Case Studies , 2007 .

[5]  A. Hurlimann.  Responding to environmental challenges: an initial assessment of higher education curricula needs by Australian planning professionals , 2009 .

[6]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Teaching Applied Geophysics at RTU: the Basics for a Fast, Green, Inexpensive Subground Investigation Method , 2010 .

[7]  Janis Vanags,et al.  Possibilities of the Integration of the Method of the Ecologically Oriented Independent Scientific Research in the Study Process , 2010 .

[8]  Annelise Carleton-Hug,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. , 2010, Evaluation and program planning.

[9]  Pilar Aznar Minguet,et al.  Introducing sustainability into university curricula: an indicator and baseline survey of the views of university teachers at the University of Valencia , 2011 .

[10]  R. Wesselink,et al.  Developing competence profiles for educators in environmental education organisations in the Netherlands , 2011 .

[11]  José M. Díaz-Puente,et al.  Relevance Evaluation of Engineering Master's Program in Peru , 2012 .

[12]  Kari Alanne,et al.  Energy engineering students on their way to expertise in sustainable energy , 2012 .

[13]  Mohamed Shehadeh,et al.  Design of a New Egyptian/European Double Master Degree in Clean Energy and Environmental Studies☆ , 2013 .

[14]  N. O. Yakovleva,et al.  Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education , 2014 .

[15]  Robert B. Powell,et al.  Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned? , 2014 .

[16]  M. Rieckmann,et al.  Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development – management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe , 2014 .

[17]  Olga Shindor,et al.  Development Of Educational Programs In Renewable And Alternative Energy Processing: The Case Of Russia , 2014 .

[18]  A. Bowe.  The development of education indicators for measuring quality in the English-speaking Caribbean: how far have we come? , 2015, Evaluation and program planning.

[19]  Sandra Caeiro,et al.  Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: experiences from Portugal , 2015 .

[20]  Noawanit Songkram,et al.  E-learning System in Virtual Learning Environment to Develop Creative Thinking for Learners in Higher Education☆ , 2015 .

[21]  Christiane Spiel,et al.  Evaluation of competence-based teaching in higher education: From theory to practice. , 2015, Evaluation and program planning.

[22]  F. Dochy,et al.  A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education , 2015 .

[23]  A. Corelli.  Direct vs. Anonymous Feedback: Teacher Behavior in Higher Education, with Focus on Technology Advances , 2015 .

[24]  Miguel Romero-Gutierrez,et al.  SWOT analysis to evaluate the programme of a joint online/onsite master's degree in environmental education through the students' perceptions. , 2016, Evaluation and program planning.

[25]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: the role of project-oriented learning , 2016 .

[26]  R. Poell,et al.  Team learning and its association with the implementation of competence-based education , 2016 .

[27]  Seren Başaran,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approaches for Selecting and Evaluating Digital Learning Objects , 2016 .

[28]  Fernando Augusto Silva Marins,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis of classrooms standardisation in a higher education institution , 2016 .

[29]  F. Celik.  Comparing distance education versus traditional education in Engineering Management Masters Program: Sakarya University Sample , 2016 .

[30]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  Future sustainability scenarios for universities: moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[31]  Rocío Valderrama-Hernández,et al.  The Complexity of Environmental Education: Teaching Ideas and Strategies from Teachers , 2017 .

[32]  M. Runco,et al.  The influence of teaching methods on creative problem finding , 2017 .

[33]  S. Kudo,et al.  Evaluating core competencies development in sustainability and environmental master's programs: An empirical analysis , 2018 .

[34]  Davis Freidenfelds,et al.  What does environmentally sustainable higher education institution mean? , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[35]  Sebastian Fiechter,et al.  Towards global sustainability: Education on environmentally clean energy technologies , 2018 .

[36]  Issa Ibrahim Berchin,et al.  A proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an environmental education program at universities , 2018 .

[37]  Kang Zhao,et al.  The more multidisciplinary the better? - The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[38]  D. Gijbels,et al.  Looking at role-play simulations of political decision-making in higher education through a contextual lens: A state-of-the-art , 2019, Educational Research Review.

[39]  Jukka Tikkanen,et al.  Shaping the concept of bioeconomy in participatory projects – An example from the post-graduate education in Finland , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[40]  D. Chiaramonti,et al.  Project BBChina: a new Master Program in three Chinese Universities on Bio-Based Circular Economy; from Fields to Bioenergy, Biofuel and Bioproducts , 2019, Energy Procedia.

[41]  M. Golba,et al.  Internal quality management in competence-based higher education – An interdisciplinary pilot study conducted in a postgraduate programme in renewable energy , 2019, Solar Energy.