Climate Modelling Shows Increased Risk to Eucalyptus sideroxylon on the Eastern Coast of Australia Compared to Eucalyptus albens

Aim: To identify the extent and direction of range shift of Eucalyptus sideroxylon and E. albens in Australia by 2050 through an ensemble forecast of four species distribution models (SDMs). Each was generated using four global climate models (GCMs), under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Location: Australia. Methods: We used four SDMs of (i) generalized linear model, (ii) MaxEnt, (iii) random forest, and (iv) boosted regression tree to construct SDMs for species E. sideroxylon and E. albens under four GCMs including (a) MRI-CGCM3, (b) MIROC5, (c) HadGEM2-AO and (d) CCSM4, under two RCPs of 4.5 and 6.0. Here, the true skill statistic (TSS) index was used to assess the accuracy of each SDM. Results: Results showed that E. albens and E. sideroxylon will lose large areas of their current suitable range by 2050 and E. sideroxylon is projected to gain in eastern and southeastern Australia. Some areas were also projected to remain suitable for each species between now and 2050. Our modelling showed that E. sideroxylon will lose suitable habitat on the western side and will not gain any on the eastern side because this region is one the most heavily populated areas in the country, and the populated areas are moving westward. The predicted decrease in E. sideroxylon’s distribution suggests that land managers should monitor its population closely, and evaluate whether it meets criteria for a protected legal status. Main conclusions: Both Eucalyptus sideroxylon and E. albens will be negatively affected by climate change and it is projected that E. sideroxylon will be at greater risk of losing habitat than E. albens.

[1]  J. I. Ortiz-Monasterio,et al.  Climate change: Can wheat beat the heat? , 2008 .

[2]  P. P. Mujumdar,et al.  Climate change impact assessment: Uncertainty modeling with imprecise probability , 2009 .

[3]  Philip K. Thornton,et al.  The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055 , 2003 .

[4]  A Kumar,et al.  Biodiversity and Climate Change , 2018 .

[5]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Can the variability in precipitation simulations across GCMs be reduced through sensible bias correction? , 2017, Climate Dynamics.

[6]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  The greening of the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau under climate change , 2017 .

[7]  T. Dawson,et al.  SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species , 2002 .

[8]  Alex J. Cannon,et al.  Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes? , 2015 .

[9]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[10]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[11]  D. J. Rogers,et al.  Prediction of the naturalisation potential and weediness risk of transgenic cotton in Australia , 2007 .

[12]  L. Kumar,et al.  A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[14]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  The art of modelling range‐shifting species , 2010 .

[15]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  A modelling implementation of climate change on biodegradation of Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) by Aspergillus niger in soil , 2015 .

[16]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[17]  Jane Elith,et al.  Maxent is not a presence–absence method: a comment on Thibaud et al. , 2014 .

[18]  Mohsen Ahmadi,et al.  Combining landscape suitability and habitat connectivity to conserve the last surviving population of cheetah in Asia , 2017 .

[19]  M. Zappa,et al.  Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence , 2009 .

[20]  D. Strayer,et al.  Usefulness of Bioclimatic Models for Studying Climate Change and Invasive Species , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[22]  C. Mantyka‐Pringle,et al.  Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012 .

[23]  Richard E. Glor,et al.  ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models , 2010 .

[24]  H. F. Hodges,et al.  A comparison of scenarios for the effect of global climate change on cotton growth and yield , 1997 .

[25]  L. Kumar,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamic climate model for Neoleucinodes elegantalis using CLIMEX , 2017, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[26]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[27]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[28]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[29]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Potential risk levels of invasive Neoleucinodes elegantalis (small tomato borer) in areas optimal for open-field Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) cultivation in the present and under predicted climate change. , 2017, Pest management science.

[30]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[31]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[32]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[33]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[34]  M. Austin,et al.  Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale , 2011 .

[35]  F. Shabani,et al.  Future distribution of cotton and wheat in Australia under potential climate change , 2015, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[36]  T. C. Whitmore,et al.  International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources , 1970, Nature.

[37]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  M. Araújo,et al.  BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions , 2009 .

[40]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[41]  L. Kumar,et al.  Projecting date palm distribution in Iran under climate change using topography, physicochemical soil properties, soil taxonomy, land use, and climate data , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[42]  Are research efforts on Animalia in the South Pacific associated with the conservation status or population trends , 2017 .

[43]  P. Spooner,et al.  Using a State-and-Transition Approach to Manage Endangered Eucalyptus albens (White Box) Woodlands , 2006, Environmental management.

[44]  L. Kumar,et al.  Future climate scenarios project a decrease in the risk of fall armyworm outbreaks , 2017, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[45]  L. Kumar,et al.  Future distributions of Fusarium oxysporum f. spp. in European, Middle Eastern and North African agricultural regions under climate change , 2014 .

[46]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[47]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[48]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[49]  L. Kumar,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on the Future Distribution of Date Palms: A Modeling Exercise Using CLIMEX , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  L. Kumar,et al.  Global risk levels for corn rusts (Puccinia sorghi and Puccinia polysora) under climate change projections , 2017 .

[51]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  L. V. Beek,et al.  The ability of a GCM-forced hydrological model to reproduce global discharge variability , 2010 .

[53]  L. Kumar,et al.  World climate suitability projections to 2050 and 2100 for growing oil palm , 2016, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[54]  R. Pattison,et al.  Potential distribution of the invasive tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: evaluating climex predictions with field trials , 2007 .

[55]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  L. Kumar,et al.  Projected future distribution of date palm and its potential use in alleviating micronutrient deficiency. , 2016, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[57]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Climate change will lead to larger areas of Spain being conducive to date palm cultivation , 2013 .