Can China achieve its 2020 carbon intensity target? A scenario analysis based on system dynamics approach

Abstract Since Chinese government put a target to decrease carbon intensity 40–45% in 2020 than that of 2005, a series of emission mitigation measures has been implemented. Against this backdrop, we established a system dynamics model to investigate the energy consumption, CO 2 emission and mitigation options in China. The results show that the carbon intensity will reduce by 22.68%, 26.84%, 43.77%, and 46.65% in BaU (Business as usual), NEP (New energy policy), CTP (Carbon tax policy) and IP (Integrated policy) scenarios in 2020 compared with 2005. Obviously, Chinese government can accomplish the target under CTP and IP scenarios. Moreover, the “inflection point” in CTP and IP scenarios reveals the decision-making process between tax burden and emission reduction behavior. A brief analysis of interactive effect is accomplished by equilibrium theory and simulation results. It shows that the interactive effect of two policies, which act on the same object with same action direction, is weaker than the aggregation of two separated effects, whereas it is larger than any individual effect. In a nutshell, these findings are helpful for policymakers to optimize their policy decision-making to cut CO 2 emissions.

[1]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Technology evolution and energy modelling: overview of research and findings , 2000 .

[2]  Wei Li,et al.  China’s Low-Carbon Scenario Analysis of CO2 Mitigation Measures towards 2050 Using a Hybrid AIM/CGE Model , 2015 .

[3]  Hassan Qudrat-Ullah,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of electricity generation capacity in Canada: A system dynamics approach , 2013 .

[4]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The differences of carbon intensity reduction rate across 89 countries in recent three decades , 2014 .

[5]  Abbas Seifi,et al.  A system dynamics model for analyzing energy consumption and CO2 emission in Iranian cement industry under various production and export scenarios , 2013 .

[6]  L. Walras Elements of Pure Economics , 1954 .

[7]  Zongguo Wen,et al.  Evaluation of energy saving potential in China's cement industry using the Asian-Pacific Integrated Model and the technology promotion policy analysis , 2015 .

[8]  Yu Liu,et al.  The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis ☆ , 2015 .

[9]  W. Ross Morrow,et al.  Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector , 2010 .

[10]  Lean Yu,et al.  Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model , 2015 .

[11]  John N. Warfield,et al.  World dynamics , 1973 .

[12]  Y. Bor,et al.  The long-term forecast of Taiwan’s energy supply and demand: LEAP model application , 2011 .

[13]  Miao-Shan Tsai,et al.  Taiwan’s 2050 low carbon development roadmap: An evaluation with the MARKAL model , 2015 .

[14]  N. Edwards,et al.  The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector , 2013, 1309.7626.

[15]  Xingping Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors , 2014 .

[16]  J. Moore,et al.  Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling , 2015 .

[17]  Junfang Tian,et al.  A system dynamics approach to scenario analysis for urban passenger transport energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing , 2015, Energy Policy.

[18]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics 3-Volume Set , 2013 .

[19]  Hana Gerbelová,et al.  Electricity decarbonisation pathways for 2050 in Portugal: A TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System) based approach in closed versus open systems modelling , 2014 .

[20]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China: Results from the CEEPA model , 2012 .

[21]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  Closing the gap? Top-down versus bottom-up projections of China’s regional energy use and CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[22]  Yi-Hsuan Shih,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach , 2014 .

[23]  Mustafa Hekimoğlu,et al.  Exploring the options for carbon dioxide mitigation in Turkish electric power industry: System dynamics approach , 2013 .

[24]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Energy-economic models and the environment , 2004 .

[25]  Chanwoong Jeon,et al.  Optimal subsidy estimation method using system dynamics and the real option model: Photovoltaic technology case , 2015 .

[26]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Future Biodiesel Policy Designs and Consumption Patterns in Latvia: a System Dynamics Model , 2015 .

[27]  A. Ford Modeling the Environment: An Introduction To System Dynamics Modeling Of Environmental Systems , 1999 .

[28]  Jay Wright Forrester,et al.  Urban Dynamics , 1969 .

[29]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[30]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  CDM’s influence on technology transfers: A study of the implemented clean development mechanism projects in China , 2015 .

[31]  Shinichiro Fujimori,et al.  Thailand's Low-Carbon Scenario 2050: The AIM/CGE analyses of CO2 mitigation measures , 2013 .

[32]  J. Tinbergen Ragnar Frisch's role in econometrics: A sketch , 1974 .

[33]  R. Li,et al.  How might China achieve its 2020 emissions target? A scenario analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions using the system dynamics model , 2015 .

[34]  Michael Jefferson IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report: “Climate change 2014: Longer report”: Critical analysis , 2015 .

[35]  Seyithan Ahmet Ates,et al.  Energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation potential of the Turkish iron and steel industry using the LEAP (long-range energy alternatives planning) system , 2015 .

[36]  Xiaodan Guo,et al.  China's photovoltaic power development under policy incentives: A system dynamics analysis , 2015 .

[37]  Ying Fan,et al.  A system dynamics model of coordinated development of central and provincial economy and oil enterprises , 2013 .

[38]  Leonidas Anthopoulos,et al.  Eco-cities: An integrated system dynamics framework and a concise research taxonomy , 2015 .