Target DNA chromatinization modulates nicking by L1 endonuclease.

L1 elements are human transposons which replicate via an RNA intermediate. At least 15% of the human genome is composed of L1 sequence. An important initial step in the transposition reaction is nicking of the genomic DNA by L1 endonuclease (L1 EN). In vivo much of the genome exists in the form of chromatin or is undergoing biochemical transactions such as transcription, replication or repair, which may alter the accessibility of the L1 transposition machinery to DNA. To investigate this possibility we have examined the effect of substrate chromatinization on the ability of L1 EN to nick DNA. We find that DNA incorporated into nucleosomes is generally refractory to nicking by L1 EN. Interestingly, nicking of a minority of DNA sequences is enhanced when included in chromatin. Thus, dynamic epigenetic factors such as chromatinization are likely to influence the relatively permanent placement of L1 and other retroelements in the human genome.

[1]  J. Jurka,et al.  Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Varmus,et al.  Retroviral integration into minichromosomes in vitro. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  Human L1 Retrotransposon Encodes a Conserved Endonuclease Required for Retrotransposition , 1996, Cell.

[4]  J. Boeke,et al.  Targeting of human retrotransposon integration is directed by the specificity of the L1 endonuclease for regions of unusual DNA structure. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[5]  E. Ballestar,et al.  Nucleosome structure completely inhibits in vitro cleavage by the V(D)J recombinase , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[6]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[7]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Disruption of Reconstituted Nucleosomes , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  D. Suck,et al.  Structure refined to 2Å of a nicked DNA octanucleotide complex with DNase I , 1988, Nature.

[9]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  High Frequency Retrotransposition in Cultured Mammalian Cells , 1996, Cell.

[10]  H H Kazazian,et al.  HUGO—a midlife crisis? , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Harold E. Varmus,et al.  Nucleosomes, DNA-binding proteins, and DNA sequence modulate retroviral integration target site selection , 1992, Cell.

[12]  M. Gellert,et al.  DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins A Possible Source of Oncogenic Translocations , 1998, Cell.

[13]  H. Hohjoh,et al.  Cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes containing human LINE‐1 protein and RNA. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[14]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: A mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition , 1993, Cell.

[15]  J. Workman,et al.  Experimental analysis of chromatin function in transcription control. , 1994, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[16]  F. Bushman,et al.  The influence of DNA and nucleosome structure on integration events directed by HIV integrase. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  F. Bushman,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus integrase directs integration to sites of severe DNA distortion within the nucleosome core. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.