Paper or Electronic: Preferences of Slovenian Students

This paper presents Slovenia’s results as part of an international study investigating student preferences of class readings regarding format (print or electronic) and factors impacting these preferences and behaviours. Common beliefs are that digital media is about to prevail over print materials, but several studies have found the contrary: most students still prefer print format over digital for their academic readings. They feel their comprehension and retention is better in print, but they like the convenience and accessibility of electronic. This issue is relevant to both libraries and teachers and instructors. The main research question of this study is: What are students’ format preferences when engaging with their academic readings? Secondary questions ask about the factors that impact their behaviors. An online survey of 25 questions was distributed in spring 2015 to students in different disciplines and levels at three public universities. Results were obtained using descriptive statistical analysis.

[1]  Diane Mizrachi,et al.  Undergraduates' Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors , 2015 .

[2]  Kelsey Corlett-Rivera,et al.  E-Book Use and Attitudes in the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education , 2014 .

[3]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[4]  Anne Mangen,et al.  Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension , 2013 .

[5]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  J. M. Noyesa,et al.  VDT versus paper-based text : reply to Mayes , Sims and Koonce , 2003 .

[7]  Wei Cheng,et al.  A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? , 2014, Journal of Computers in Education.

[8]  Roger Strouse The changing face of content users and the impact on information providers , 2004 .

[9]  Daniela Zambarbieri,et al.  Eye movement analysis of reading from computer displays, eReaders and printed books , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  Erik Wästlund,et al.  Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Diane Mizrachi,et al.  Online or Print: Which Do Students Prefer? , 2014, ECIL.

[13]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[14]  Muhammad Asim Qayyum,et al.  Capturing the online academic reading process , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking , 2007 .

[16]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  Astronomie Physik,et al.  Principle of Least Effort , 2010 .

[18]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers , 2011, CHI.

[19]  Diane Mizrachi Undergraduates' academic information and library behaviors: preliminary results , 2010 .

[20]  David Waterman,et al.  Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: Cost-efficiency and perceived learning , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  астрономия Физика Principle of Least Effort , 2010 .

[22]  Juris Dilevko,et al.  Print sources in an electronic age: A vital part of the research process for undergraduate students , 2002 .

[23]  Schubert Foo,et al.  A study of graduate student end-users' use and perception of electronic journals , 2000, Online Inf. Rev..

[24]  Nancy M. Foasberg Student Reading Practices in Print and Electronic Media , 2014, Coll. Res. Libr..