Response spectral attenuation relationships for Singapore and the Malay Peninsula due to distant Sumatran‐fault earthquakes

As part of the effort to assess the seismic hazards of Singapore and the Malay Peninsula, representative ground motion prediction models have to be established. Seven existing attenuation relationships developed for shallow crustal earthquakes in stable continent and active tectonic regions are examined, and they are found to consistently over-predict the ground motions of Sumatran-fault earthquakes recently recorded in Singapore. This may be attributed to the differences in the regional crustal structures and distance ranges considered. Since the number of recorded ground motions in the region is very limited, a new set of attenuation relationships is derived based on synthetic seismograms. The uncertainties in rupture parameters, such as stress drop, focal depth, dip and rake angles, are defined according to the regional geological and tectonic settings as well as the ruptures of previous earthquakes. Ground motions are simulated for earthquakes with Mw ranging from 4.0 to 8.0, within a distance range from 174 to 1379km. Besides magnitude and distance, source-to-station azimuth is found to influence the amplitudes of the ground motions simulated. Thus, the azimuth is taken as an independent variable in the derived ground motion attenuation relationships. The Sumatran-fault segments that have the potential to generate a specified level of response spectral accelerations in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur are identified based on the newly derived ground motion models. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[2]  Tso-Chien Pan,et al.  Historical earthquakes felt in Singapore , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Tso-Chien Pan,et al.  Estimation of Peak Ground Accelerations of the Malay Peninsula due to Distant Sumatra Earthquakes , 2002 .

[4]  N. N. Ambraseys,et al.  PREDICTION OF VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[5]  Y. Bock,et al.  One century of tectonic deformation along the Sumatran fault from triangulation and Global Positioning System surveys , 2000 .

[6]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[7]  K. Campbell.  An empirical analysis of peak horizontal acceleration for the Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of 18 October 1989 , 1991 .

[8]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion relations for eastern North America , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[10]  T. Fitch.  Plate convergence, transcurrent faults, and internal deformation adjacent to Southeast Asia and the western Pacific , 1972 .

[11]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[12]  R. Lawrence Edwards,et al.  Submergence and uplift associated with the giant 1833 Sumatran subduction earthquake: Evidence from coral microatolls , 1999 .

[13]  K. Kohketsu.  The extended reflectivity method for synthetic near-field seismograms , 1985 .

[14]  R. Mccaffrey.  Slip vectors and stretching of the Sumatran fore arc , 1991 .

[15]  W. Mccann,et al.  Seismic history and seismotectonics of the Sunda Arc , 1987 .

[16]  Paul Somerville,et al.  Comparison of source scaling relations of eastern and western North American earthquakes , 1987 .

[17]  G. R. Toro,et al.  Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties , 1997 .

[18]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[19]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Distribution of slip at the northern Sumatran fault system , 2000 .

[20]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[21]  Tso-Chien Pan,et al.  Prediction of the maximum credible ground motion in Singapore due to a great Sumatran subduction earthquake: the worst‐case scenario , 2002 .

[22]  Sunaryo,et al.  Lateral variation in slab orientation beneath Toba Caldera, northern Sumatra , 1996 .

[23]  T. Lay,et al.  Modern Global Seismology , 1995 .

[24]  Danny Hilman Natawidjaja,et al.  Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia , 2000 .

[25]  K. Campbell,et al.  Empirical analysis of strong ground motion from the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994 .

[26]  Tso-Chien Pan,et al.  When the doorbell rings–a case of building response to a long distance earthquake , 1995 .

[27]  H. Bungum,et al.  Attenuation models inferred from intraplate earthquake recordings , 1990 .

[28]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Global Plate Velocities from the Global Positioning System , 1997 .

[29]  R. Mccaffrey.  Oblique plate convergence, slip vectors, and forearc deformation , 1992 .

[30]  Y. Fukushima,et al.  Reply to T. Masuda and M. Ohtake's “Comment on ‘A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan’” , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.