J.N. Katz and E. Losina comment on the above letters

In their meta-analysis of the effectiveness of navigated total knee replacement, Bauwens et al. found that navigation was associated with favorable results in terms of several radiographic parameters. The data were insufficient to evaluate effects on complication rates or functional outcomes. The article stimulated the above letter from Mason et al. and a letter from Gregori and Holt13, which prompted additional letters of clarification from Bauwens et al. Caught in the crossfire, readers might well ask why a meta-analysis led to such editorial dueling. Of note, controversy over meta-analysis is long-standing14. The debates stem in part from the methodological complexity of meta-analysis, a powerful but challenging analytic technique that permits pooling of estimates across studies. We will discuss a few of the many methodological complexities of meta-analysis to put the correspondence about navigated total knee replacement in perspective. If pooling raises so many questions, why bother to pool estimates quantitatively across studies? In many reviews, the authors simply array the findings of separate studies in evidence tables without attempting to synthesize them quantitatively into single estimates of effect. A key rationale for pooling is that the available evidence may consist of small studies that show positive (or negative) effects but lack power to establish the associations with significance. Pooling these smaller studies may avoid false-negative results due to Type-II error. A useful example of this application of meta-analysis was provided by Felson and Anderson in a meta-analysis of the effect of cytotoxic therapy and corticosteroids compared with that of corticosteroids alone for patients with lupus nephritis15. Prior small studies had suggested a beneficial effect of cytotoxic therapy. The meta-analysis overcame the small sample sizes of the component studies and illustrated the beneficial effect of cytotoxic therapy across studies. Pooling also permits the investigator to …

[1]  N. Confalonieri,et al.  Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. , 2005, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[2]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKA: A Single-Surgeon Experience , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Richard L Wixson,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  K. Buehler,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Eloise E Kaizar Metaanalyses Are Observational Studies: How Lack of Randomization Impacts Analysis , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  Martin Stockheim,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation Increases Precision of Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  J. Grifka,et al.  Der navigationsgestützte bicondyläre Oberflächenersatz bei der sekundären Gonarthrose des RA-Patienten im Vergleich zur konventionellen Implantationstechnik , 2004, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[10]  M Tingart,et al.  [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique]. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie.

[11]  M. Tingart,et al.  Navigation in total-knee arthroplastyCT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  D. Banzer,et al.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  R. K. Mielke,et al.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique]. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[14]  P Cinquin,et al.  [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study]. , 2001, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[15]  S. Goodman,et al.  Have you ever meta-analysis you didn't like? , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  D. Felson,et al.  Evidence for the superiority of immunosuppressive drugs and prednisone over prednisone alone in lupus nephritis. Results of a pooled analysis. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.