Disclosure as a tool in stakeholder relations management: a longitudinal study on the Port of Rotterdam

This study applies stakeholder management principles to the port domain. We provide a conceptual framework for evaluating the communication strategies a (landlord) Port Authority (PA) relies on in the management of its relevant stakeholders and the adoption of disclosure to critical issues. The theoretical arguments are supported by empirical evidences from the Port of Rotterdam (PoR), i.e. a major port which leverages disclosure to successfully manage stakeholders and support the implementation of corporate strategy. The research questions are addressed using a content analysis on the annual reports (ARs) of PoR in the period 2000–2012. The overall research design enables the investigation of PA disclosure as a tool for managing the evolving interests of stakeholders from a longitudinal perspective. The PoR case shows that the relative importance of topics reported in the ARs change over time, as a result of external pressures and internal key events. The outcomes demonstrate the growing attention of PoR on topics relevant to the broader community (e.g. environment and safety/security) after a period characterised by a prominent focus on financial and governance issues. Besides, key breakthrough forces stimulating the shifts in landlord communication strategies are identified and discussed. Finally, by suggesting an indirect approach to evaluate how PA prioritises its salient stakeholders, the paper adds to extant port literature and brings methodological implications.

[1]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States , 2007 .

[2]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? , 2010 .

[3]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[4]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines , 2013 .

[5]  Giovanni Satta,et al.  Emerging Port Authority communication strategies: Assessing the determinants of disclosure in the annual report , 2013 .

[6]  Jonathan G. S. Koppell Hybrid Organizations and the Alignment of Interests: The Case of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac , 2001 .

[7]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Stakeholders relations management in ports: dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment , 2002 .

[8]  Brian Slack,et al.  Regional governance of port development in China: a case study of Shanghai International Shipping Center , 2004 .

[9]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sectors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line , 1988 .

[10]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Dealing with stakeholders in the port planning process , 2003 .

[11]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[12]  Julián Pando *,et al.  Marketing management at the world's major ports , 2005 .

[13]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[14]  Ana C. Paixão Casaca,et al.  Motorway of the sea port requirements: the viewpoint of port authorities , 2008 .

[15]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Port privatization policy and practice , 2002 .

[16]  Paul Davidsson,et al.  Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: an approach to sustainable port and terminal management , 2004 .

[17]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: The Case of Rotterdam/Amsterdam, the Netherlands , 2013 .

[18]  M. Brooks Port devolution and governance in Canada , 2007 .

[19]  Wouter Jacobs Political economy of port competition : institutional analyses of Rotterdam, Southern California and Dubai , 2007 .

[20]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Port Economics, Policy and Management: Content Classification and Survey , 2011 .

[21]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[22]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Assessing port governance models: process and performance components , 2008 .

[23]  Cimen Karatas-Cetin,et al.  Port Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Supply Chains: A Framework on Resource Dependence Theory , 2012 .

[24]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[25]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[26]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[27]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Chapter 11 Whither Port Strategy? Theory and Practice in Conflict , 2007 .

[28]  J. Luis Guasch,et al.  Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions: Doing it Right , 2004 .

[29]  R. Stoker The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[30]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  PORT GOVERNANCE IN CHINA: A REVIEW OF POLICIES IN AN ERA OF INTERNATIONALIZING PORT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES , 2004 .

[31]  Stephen Cahoon,et al.  Marketing communications for seaports: a matter of survival and growth , 2007 .

[32]  Chung Yu,et al.  A STUDY ON INTEGRATED PORT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF BALANCED SCORECARD , 2003 .

[33]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: Towards a research agenda , 2013 .

[34]  Trudie Aberdeen Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[35]  M. Brooks Chapter 11 Port Devolution and Governance in Canada , 2006 .

[36]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Chapter 20 Stakeholders, Conflicting Interests and Governance in Port Clusters , 2006 .

[37]  Hidde Siemonsma,et al.  Awarding of Port PPP contracts: the added value of a competitive dialogue procedure , 2012 .

[38]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform , 2011 .

[39]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010) , 2013 .

[40]  Patrick Yarnell,et al.  Port Administration and Integrated Coastal Management under the Canada Marine Act in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada , 1999 .

[41]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority , 2013 .

[42]  C. Tilt The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate SocialDisclosure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1994 .

[43]  Francesca Moglia,et al.  Port Planning: the Need for a New Approach? , 2003 .

[44]  V. Beattie,et al.  A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes , 2004 .

[45]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[46]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of , 2013 .

[47]  Van der Horst,et al.  New indicators to measure port performance , 2007 .

[48]  César Ducruet Italian Port Authorities Approaching the Post-reform: The Ligurian Case , 2016 .

[49]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[50]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[51]  Stephen Cahoon,et al.  Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world? , 2010 .

[52]  Howard Davey,et al.  The information gap in annual reports , 2002 .