Rationales for public intervention from a system of innovation approach: the case of VINNOVA

This paper discusses the implications of the adoption of the National Innovation Systems approach for innovation policy. It starts by positioning the 'systemic' approach against other theoretical approaches, such as neoclassical theories. The authors argue that the adoption of one or the other frameworks leads to different criteria for intervention. The main rationales for public intervention under each approach are then discussed. We make a distinction between classic market failures (grounded in neoclassical theory) and systemic problems -often called systemic failures - (grounded in the evolutionary/systemic approaches). On the basis of this, the authors will discuss other important issues to be considered when discussing public policy intervention under a system of innovation. The example of VINNOVA will be used to illustrate the discussion.

[1]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[2]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[3]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: Implications for European Innovation Policy , 2004 .

[4]  Johan Hauknes,et al.  Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services , 1999 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[6]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Industrial policy from a systems-of-innovation perspective , 2006 .

[7]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[9]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[10]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[11]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[12]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[13]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[15]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[16]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[17]  Olof Ejermo,et al.  The Swedish paradox , 2006 .

[18]  Keith Smith.  Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy , 2000 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[20]  E. Mansfield.  The economics of technological change , 1968 .

[21]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .