Factors That Affect Public Intention to Share Social Justice Report Using Mobile Phone in Mongolia

Modern mobile phone technology offers various kinds of advantages for social justice. Its easy communication and interaction way has been impacting social justice, which is one of the key concepts of sustainability. The main purpose of this paper is to determine factors that affect public intention to share social justice report using mobile phones in Mongolia. The study adapts to Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory Planned Behavior (TPB) with seven hypothesis. The results show that all of those seven hypotheses are supported. The most influenced factor is Perceived Ease of Use of Social Interaction of Mobile phone. This study contributes to the theory of social justice in providing a clear framework in how citizens express their social justice reports through mobile phones. The results also benefit to the government officers as well as internet marketers.

[1]  Jessica Clark,et al.  Social justice documentary: designing for impact , 2011 .

[2]  Gerardine De Sanctis,et al.  Expectancy Theory as an Explanation of Voluntary Use of a Decision-Support System: , 1983 .

[3]  Joey F. George,et al.  The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing , 2004, Internet Res..

[4]  Isaac Prilleltensky.  Value-Based Praxis in Community Psychology: Moving Toward Social Justice and Social Action , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[5]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Lon Safko,et al.  The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success , 2009 .

[7]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[8]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Oren Gil-Or,et al.  Social group buying pricing decisions , 2012 .

[10]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[11]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[12]  N. Yeates,et al.  Social Justice: Welfare, Crime and Society , 2008 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[17]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[18]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Sang-Won Lee,et al.  On social Web sites , 2010, Inf. Syst..

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  S. Torres-Harding,et al.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS) , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[22]  Dan W. Brockt,et al.  The Theory of Justice , 2017 .

[23]  R. Sugden.  Commodities and Capabilities , 1986 .