Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape

Significance In addition to binding to a desired target molecule, all antibody drugs must also meet a set of criteria regarding the feasibility of their manufacture, stability in storage, and absence of off-target stickiness. This suite of characteristics is often termed “developability.” We present here a comprehensive analysis of these properties for essentially the full set of antibody drugs that have been tested in phase-2 or -3 clinical trials, or are approved by the FDA. Surprisingly, many of the drugs or candidates in this set exhibit properties that indicate significant developability risks; however, the number of such red warning flags decreases with advancement toward approval. This reference dataset should help prioritize future drug candidates for development. Antibodies are a highly successful class of biological drugs, with over 50 such molecules approved for therapeutic use and hundreds more currently in clinical development. Improvements in technology for the discovery and optimization of high-potency antibodies have greatly increased the chances for finding binding molecules with desired biological properties; however, achieving drug-like properties at the same time is an additional requirement that is receiving increased attention. In this work, we attempt to quantify the historical limits of acceptability for multiple biophysical metrics of “developability.” Amino acid sequences from 137 antibodies in advanced clinical stages, including 48 approved for therapeutic use, were collected and used to construct isotype-matched IgG1 antibodies, which were then expressed in mammalian cells. The resulting material for each source antibody was evaluated in a dozen biophysical property assays. The distributions of the observed metrics are used to empirically define boundaries of drug-like behavior that can represent practical guidelines for future antibody drug candidates.

[1]  H. Kettenberger,et al.  Developability assessment during the selection of novel therapeutic antibodies. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  Feng Wang,et al.  Somatic hypermutation maintains antibody thermodynamic stability during affinity maturation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Ken A. Dill,et al.  In silico selection of therapeutic antibodies for development: Viscosity, clearance, and chemical stability , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Steffen Hartmann,et al.  Best Practices in Assessment of Developability of Biopharmaceutical Candidates , 2015 .

[5]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[6]  Peter M Tessier,et al.  Rapid analysis of antibody self-association in complex mixtures using immunogold conjugates. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[7]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Protein Folding Stability Can Determine the Efficiency of Escape from Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  R. M. Owen,et al.  An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[9]  Lisa J. Bernstein,et al.  A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance , 2012, mAbs.

[10]  S. Jacobs,et al.  Cross-Interaction Chromatography: A Rapid Method to Identify Highly Soluble Monoclonal Antibody Candidates , 2009, Pharmaceutical Research.

[11]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Target-independent variable region mediated effects on antibody clearance can be FcRn independent , 2016, mAbs.

[12]  Ying Tang,et al.  The interplay of non-specific binding, target-mediated clearance and FcRn interactions on the pharmacokinetics of humanized antibodies , 2015, mAbs.

[13]  Linda O Narhi,et al.  High-throughput assessment of thermal and colloidal stability parameters for monoclonal antibody formulations. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  Thomas Emrich,et al.  Charge-mediated influence of the antibody variable domain on FcRn-dependent pharmacokinetics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Secretion efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor mutants lacking disulfide bonds is correlated with thermodynamic stability. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[16]  Deborah S. Goldberg,et al.  Plasmonic measurements of monoclonal antibody self‐association using self‐interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Melissa L Geddie,et al.  A novel screening method to assess developability of antibody-like molecules , 2015, mAbs.

[18]  Yingda Xu,et al.  High throughput detection of antibody self-interaction by bio-layer interferometry , 2013, mAbs.

[19]  Maxim N. Artyomov,et al.  Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation , 2010, Nature.

[20]  N. Warne,et al.  Development of high concentration protein biopharmaceuticals: the use of platform approaches in formulation development. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[21]  Yingda Xu,et al.  An alternative assay to hydrophobic interaction chromatography for high-throughput characterization of monoclonal antibodies , 2015, mAbs.

[22]  Abner Louis Notkins,et al.  Half-life of polyreactive antibodies , 1994, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[23]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Addressing polyspecificity of antibodies selected from an in vitro yeast presentation system: a FACS-based, high-throughput selection and analytical tool. , 2013, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[24]  Kiichi Fukui,et al.  Fc domain mediated self-association of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody under a low ionic strength condition. , 2011, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[25]  Mohammed Shameem,et al.  Improving monoclonal antibody selection and engineering using measurements of colloidal protein interactions. , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[26]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  High throughput cross-interaction measures for human IgG1 antibodies correlate with clearance rates in mice , 2015, mAbs.

[28]  Stacey Spencer,et al.  Solubility evaluation of murine hybridoma antibodies , 2012, mAbs.

[29]  Olga Obrezanova,et al.  Aggregation risk prediction for antibodies and its application to biotherapeutic development , 2015, mAbs.

[30]  P. Leeson,et al.  The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[31]  William F Weiss,et al.  High-throughput analysis of concentration-dependent antibody self-association. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Bernhardt L Trout,et al.  Developability index: a rapid in silico tool for the screening of antibody aggregation propensity. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[33]  Yingda Xu,et al.  High-throughput screening for developability during early-stage antibody discovery using self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy , 2014, mAbs.