Auditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications

Irrelevant sound tends to break through selective attention and impair cognitive performance. This observation has been brought under systematic scrutiny by laboratory studies measuring interference with memory performance during exposure to irrelevant sound. These studies established that the degree of interference depends on the properties of the irrelevant sound as well as those of the cognitive task. The way in which this interference increases or diminishes as characteristics of the sound and of the cognitive task are changed reveals key functional characteristics of auditory distraction. A number of important practical implications that arise from these studies are discussed, including the finding that relatively quiet background sound will have a marked effect on efficiency in performing cognitive tasks.

[1]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Articulatory coding and phonological judgements on written words and pictures: The role of the phonological output buffer. , 1991 .

[3]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise , 1997 .

[4]  W J Macken,et al.  Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: single or double agency? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Richard M. Warren,et al.  Identification of temporal order within auditory sequences , 1972 .

[6]  C. P. Beaman,et al.  The object-oriented episodic record model , 1996 .

[7]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  On the Irrelevance of Semantic Information for the “Irrelevant Speech” Effect , 1996 .

[10]  Simon P. Banbury,et al.  'Irrelevant Sound Effect': The effects of extraneous sounds on aircrew performance , 1999 .

[11]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Effects of Irrelevant Sounds on Phonological Coding in Reading Comprehension and Short term Memory , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  Jürgen Hellbrück,et al.  Wirkungen der zeitlichen Struktur von Hintergrundschall auf das Arbeitsgedächtnis und ihre theoretischen und praktischen Implikationen. , 1995 .

[13]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music , 1988 .

[14]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The effects of irrelevant speech on immediate free recall , 1990 .

[15]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .

[16]  Deborah M. Shaibe,et al.  On the Irrelevance of Phonological Similarity to the Irrelevant Speech Effect , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. , 1998 .

[19]  Ian Neath,et al.  Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? , 1996 .

[21]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[22]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  A Baddeley,et al.  The unattended speech effect: perception or memory? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J Nemecek,et al.  Noise in landscaped offices. , 1973, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  A Baddeley,et al.  Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[27]  D. Berry,et al.  Disruption of office‐related tasks by speech and office noise , 1998 .

[28]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? , 1990 .

[29]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[30]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[31]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[32]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. , 1993 .

[33]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[34]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[35]  E. N. Solokov.  Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[36]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  Auditory Perception of Temporal Order , 1959 .

[38]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[39]  N Cowan,et al.  Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory , 1991 .

[41]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? , 1995 .

[42]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Models Of Short-Term Memory , 1996 .

[43]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect". , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Alan B. Welsh,et al.  Acoustic masking in primary memory. , 1976 .

[45]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[47]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[48]  R Meddis,et al.  Computer simulation of auditory stream segregation in alternating-tone sequences. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Habituation to irrelevant speech: Effects on a visual short-term memory task , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  J. Richardson,et al.  Developing the theory of working memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Dylan Marc Jones.  The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture , 1999 .

[53]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference: A reply to Cowan and Barron (1987) , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control , 1979 .

[56]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Effects of Background Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory , 1989 .

[57]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location , 1995 .

[58]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Nick Mosdell,et al.  The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound , 1997 .

[60]  M. Hanson.  Contemporary ergonomics 1998 , 1998 .

[61]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .

[62]  H. Nittono,et al.  Background Instrumental Music and Serial Recall , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[63]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Language , 2018, Working Memories.

[64]  S Tremblay,et al.  Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  HERMAN BUSCHKE,et al.  Relative Retention in Immediate Memory determined by the Missing Scan Method , 1963, Nature.

[66]  Bill Macken,et al.  Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect : Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 2001 .

[67]  I. Neath.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing state? , 1999 .

[69]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[70]  Herbert A. Colle,et al.  Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: effects of noise intensity and spatial location , 1980 .

[71]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect , 1999 .

[72]  A Buchner,et al.  Irrelevant auditory material affects counting. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.