Modeling distribution and abundance of Antarctic baleen whales using ships of opportunity

Information on animal abundance and distribution is at the cornerstone of many wildlife and conservation strategies. However, these data can be difficult and costly to obtain for cetacean species. The expense of sufficient ship time to conduct design-unbiased line transect surveys may be simply out of reach for researchers in many countries, which nonetheless grapple with problems of conservation of endangered species, by-catch of small cetaceans in commercial fisheries, and progression toward ecosystem-based fisheries management. Recently developed spatial modeling techniques show promise for estimating wildlife abundance using non-randomized surveys, but have yet to receive much field-testing in areas where designed surveys have also been conducted. Effort and sightings data were collected along 9 650 km of transects aboard ships of opportunity in the Southern Ocean during the austral summers of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. Generalized additive models with generalized cross-validation were used to express heterogeneity of cetacean sightings as functions of spatial covariates. Models were used to map predicted densities and to estimate abundance of humpback, minke, and fin whales in the Drake Passage and along the Antarctic Peninsula. All species' distribution maps showed strong density gradients, which were robust to jackknife resampling when each of 14 trips was removed sequentially with replacement. Looped animations of model predictions of whale density illustrate uncertainty in distribution estimates in a way that is informative to non-scientists. The best abundance estimate for humpback whales was 1 829 (95% CI: 978-3 422). Abundance of fin whales was 4 487 (95% CI: 1 326-15 179) and minke whales was 1,544 (95% CI: 1,221-1,953). These estimates agreed roughly with those reported from a designed survey conducted in the region during the previous austral summer. These estimates assumed that all animals on the trackline were detected, but preliminary results suggest that any negative bias due to violation of this assumption was likely small. Similarly, current methodological limitations prohibit inclusion of all known sources of uncertainty in the favored variance estimator. Meanwhile, our approach can be seen generally as an inexpensive pilot study to identify areas of predicted high density that could be targeted to: inform stratified designs for future line transect surveys, making them less expensive and more precise; increase efficiency of future photo-identification or biopsy studies; identify candidate time-area fisheries closures to minimize by-catch; or direct ecotourism activities. The techniques are likely to apply to areas where funding is limiting, where cetacean studies or wilderness-based tourism are just beginning, or in regions where even a very rough estimate of animal abundance is needed for conservation or management purposes.

[1]  Paul R. Wade,et al.  CALCULATING LIMITS TO THE ALLOWABLE HUMAN‐CAUSED MORTALITY OF CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS , 1998 .

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  I. Boyd.  Integrated environment–prey–predator interactions off South Georgia: implications for management of fisheries , 2002 .

[4]  W. Bowen,et al.  Role of marine mammals in aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[5]  C. Lafortuna,et al.  MEDITERRANEAN FIN WHALE'S (BALAENOPTERA PHYSALUS) RESPONSE TO SMALL VESSELS AND BIOPSY SAMPLING ASSESSED THROUGH PASSIVE TRACKING AND TIMING OF RESPIRATION , 2003 .

[6]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized additive models for medical research , 1986, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  W. Dolphin,et al.  Ventilation and dive patterns of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, on their Alaskan feeding grounds , 1987 .

[8]  P. Wade,et al.  Potential limits to anthropogenic mortality for harbour porpoises in the Baltic region , 2002 .

[9]  Alexander Gillespie,et al.  The International Whaling Commission and the Future of Cetaceans in a Changing World , 2002 .

[10]  H. Marsh,et al.  Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna , 1989 .

[11]  S. Wood.  Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties , 2000 .

[12]  Robn Williams.  Cetacean studies using platforms of opportunity , 2003 .

[13]  G. Ellis,et al.  Killer whales : the natural history and genealogy of Orinus orca in British Columbia and Washington , 2000 .

[14]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[15]  O. Vidal.  Aquatic Mammal Conservation in Latin America: Problems and Perspectives , 1993 .

[16]  P. Hammond,et al.  Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Incorporating the Proceedings of the symposium and workshop on individual recognition and the estimation of cetacean population parameters , 1990 .

[17]  A. Trites,et al.  Predictions of critical habitat for five whale species in the waters of coastal British Columbia , 2001 .

[18]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Horvitz-Thompson Estimators for Double-Platform Line Transect Surveys , 1998 .

[19]  S. Buckland.  Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[20]  R. Laws.  Seals and Whales of the Southern Ocean , 1977 .

[21]  S. Wood.  Thin plate regression splines , 2003 .

[22]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife Estimate of Variance , 1981 .

[23]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Social organization of mammal-eating killer whales : group stability and dispersal patterns , 2000 .

[24]  K. Burnham,et al.  Mathematical models for nonparametric inferences from line transect data. , 1976, Biometrics.

[25]  B. Efron.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[26]  D. Borchers,et al.  Mark-Recapture Models for Line Transect Surveys , 1998 .

[27]  Fernanda F. C. Marques.  Estimating wildlife distribution and abundance from line transect surveys conducted from platforms of opportunity , 2001 .

[28]  S. Hooker,et al.  Marine Protected Area Design and the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Cetaceans in a Submarine Canyon , 1999 .

[29]  Villy Christensen,et al.  Competition between fisheries and marine mammals for prey and primary production in the Pacific Ocean , 1997 .

[30]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[31]  G. Ellis,et al.  MIGRATION AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF NORTHEASTERN PACIFIC WHALES OFF COASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA: AN ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL WHALING RECORDS FROM 1908‐1967 , 2000 .

[32]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A survey design for monitoring the abundance of arboreal marsupials in the Central Highlands of Victoria , 2003 .

[33]  R. Payne,et al.  RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF LARGE WHALES AROUND SOUTH GEORGIA (1979–1998)1 , 1999 .

[34]  Samantha Strindberg.  Optimized automated survey design in wildlife population assessment , 2001 .

[35]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[36]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters , 2002 .

[37]  Rupert G. Miller.  The jackknife-a review , 1974 .

[38]  M. Tasker,et al.  Distribution and relative abundance of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena L.), white-beaked dolphins (Lagenorhynchus albirostris Gray), and minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata Lacepède) around the British Isles , 1995 .

[39]  Karin A. Forney,et al.  Environmental Models of Cetacean Abundance: Reducing Uncertainty in Population Trends , 2000 .

[40]  S. Hooker,et al.  Social organization in northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus: not driven by deep-water foraging? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  J. G. Nelson,et al.  The Spread of Ecotourism: Some Planning Implications , 1994, Environmental Conservation.