Multilevel bandwidth measurements and capacity exploitation in gigabit passive optical networks

The authors report an experimental investigation on the measurement of the available bandwidth for the users in gigabit passive optical networks (GPON) and the limitations caused by the Internet protocols, and transfer control protocol (TCP) in particular. We point out that the huge capacity offered by the GPON highlights the enormous differences that can be showed among the available and actually exploitable bandwidth. In fact, while the physical layer capacity can reach value of 100 Mb/s and more, the bandwidth at disposal of the user (i.e. either throughput at transport layer or goodput at application layer) can be much lower when applications and services based on TCP protocol are considered. In the context of service level agreements (SLA) verification, we show how to simultaneously measure throughput and line capacity by offering a method to verify multilayer SLA. We also show how it is possible to better exploit the physical layer capacity by adopting multiple TCP connections avoiding the bottleneck of a single connection.

[1]  T. V. Lakshman,et al.  TCP/IP performance with random loss and bidirectional congestion , 2000, TNET.

[2]  L. Rea,et al.  Italian QoS monitoring network: Impact on SLA control , 2012, 2012 15th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (NETWORKS).

[3]  Marco Mellia,et al.  Exploiting hybrid measurements for network troubleshooting , 2014, 2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks).

[4]  David Ros,et al.  TCP Performance over Gigabit-Capable Passive Optical Networks , 2008, AccessNets.

[5]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Fairness of downstream TCP throughput among diversely located ONUs in a GE-PON system , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[6]  Jon Postel,et al.  Transmission Control Protocol , 1981, RFC.

[7]  Marco Mellia,et al.  Measuring IP and TCP behavior on edge nodes with Tstat , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Jon Postel,et al.  File Transfer Protocol , 1985, RFC.

[9]  Nick McKeown,et al.  Part I: buffer sizes for core routers , 2005, CCRV.

[10]  F. Matera,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Quality of Service in an IP All-Optical Network Adopting Wavelength Conversion , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[11]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  A comparison of dynamic bandwidth allocation for EPON, GPON, and next-generation TDM PON , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  C. Lévi-Strauss,et al.  Experimental investigation , 2013 .

[13]  Wanjiun Liao,et al.  TCP fairness in ethernet over passive optical networks (EPON) , 2006, CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006..

[14]  F. Matera,et al.  QoE and QoS comparison in an anycast digital television platform operating on passive optical network , 2012, 2012 15th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (NETWORKS).

[15]  Amogh Dhamdhere,et al.  Open issues in router buffer sizing , 2006, CCRV.

[16]  Sunand Tullimalli,et al.  Multimedia streaming using multiple TCP connections , 2006 .

[17]  T. V. Lakshman,et al.  The performance of TCP/IP for networks with high bandwidth-delay products and random loss , 1997, TNET.

[18]  Anthony McGregor,et al.  Measured Comparative Performance of TCP Stacks , 2005, PAM.

[19]  Wanjiun Liao,et al.  On the throughput and fairness performance of TCP over ethernet passive optical networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Alessandro Valenti,et al.  On the Impact of Operative Systems Choice in End-User Bandwidth Evaluation: Testing and Analysis in a Metro-Access Network , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Evolving Internet.

[21]  M. S. Moreolo,et al.  Optical Fiber Communication Conference , 2014 .

[22]  Guido Appenzeller,et al.  Sizing router buffers , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.