Application of real-time PCR for total airborne bacterial assessment: Comparison with epifluorescence microscopy and culture-dependent methods

Abstract Traditional culture-dependent methods to quantify and identify airborne microorganisms are limited by factors such as short-duration sampling times and inability to count non-culturable or non-viable bacteria. Consequently, the quantitative assessment of bioaerosols is often underestimated. Use of the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) to quantify bacteria in environmental samples presents an alternative method, which should overcome this problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a real-time Q-PCR assay as a simple and reliable way to quantify the airborne bacterial load within poultry houses and sewage treatment plants, in comparison with epifluorescence microscopy and culture-dependent methods. The estimates of bacterial load that we obtained from real-time PCR and epifluorescence methods, are comparable, however, our analysis of sewage treatment plants indicate these methods give values 270–290 fold greater than those obtained by the “impaction on nutrient agar” method. The culture-dependent method of air impaction on nutrient agar was also inadequate in poultry houses, as was the impinger-culture method, which gave a bacterial load estimate 32-fold lower than obtained by Q-PCR. Real-time quantitative PCR thus proves to be a reliable, discerning, and simple method that could be used to estimate airborne bacterial load in a broad variety of other environments expected to carry high numbers of airborne bacteria.

[1]  Chihshan Li,et al.  Real-time quantitative PCR with gene probe, fluorochrome and flow cytometry for microorganism analysis. , 2005, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[2]  G. Mainelis,et al.  Development and calibration of real-time PCR for quantification of airborne microorganisms in air samples , 2006 .

[3]  G. Lingua,et al.  Development and Use of Flow Cytometry for Detection of Airborne Fungi , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  G. Toranzos,et al.  Use of solid-phase PCR for enhanced detection of airborne microorganisms , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Use of limulus assay to compare the biological activity of peptidoglycan and endotoxin. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Immunitatsforschung, experimentelle und klinische Immunologie.

[6]  L. Stetzenbach,et al.  PCR for bioaerosol monitoring: sensitivity and environmental interference , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  J. Pratt,et al.  Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present. , 1994, Microbiological reviews.

[8]  P. H. Roy,et al.  Development of a PCR Assay for Identification of Staphylococci at Genus and Species Levels , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  John Dunbar,et al.  Levels of Bacterial Community Diversity in Four Arid Soils Compared by Cultivation and 16S rRNA Gene Cloning , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  R. Rylander Health effects among workers in sewage treatment plants. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  B. Danuser,et al.  Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[12]  A. Bennett,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of airborne microorganisms used in biotechnology , 1997 .

[13]  E. Monsó,et al.  Sensibilización y asma ocupacional en los avicultores , 2002 .

[14]  M. Garbelotto,et al.  Detection and Quantification of Airborne Conidia of Fusarium circinatum, the Causal Agent of Pine Pitch Canker, from Two California Sites by Using a Real-Time PCR Approach Combined with a Simple Spore Trapping Method , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  Chihshan Li,et al.  Quantification of Airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health Care Setting Using Real-Time qPCR Coupled to an Air-Sampling Filter Method , 2005 .

[16]  M. Deloge-Abarkan,et al.  Detection of airborne Legionella while showering using liquid impingement and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[17]  W. Eduard,et al.  Recognition errors in the quantification of micro-organisms by fluorescence microscopy. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Xiao‐Ru Wang,et al.  Detection and quantification of Cladosporium in aerosols by real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[19]  P. Whitten,et al.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  M. Schloter,et al.  PCR primers and functional probes for amplification and detection of bacterial genes for extracellular peptidases in single strains and in soil. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[21]  H. Chung,et al.  Exposure of Workers to Airborne Microorganisms in Open-Air Swine Houses , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  L. Ranjard,et al.  Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. , 2000, Research in microbiology.

[23]  J Seedorf,et al.  [Total count of bacteria in the air of three different laying hen housing systems]. , 2003, DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[24]  Chihshan Li,et al.  Bioaerosol characterization by flow cytometry with fluorochrome. , 2005, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[25]  A. Oppliger,et al.  Influence of seasons and sampling strategy on assessment of bioaerosols in sewage treatment plants in Switzerland. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[26]  B. Zucker,et al.  Airborne gram-negative bacterial flora in animal houses. , 2000, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[27]  K. Schwab,et al.  Development of a method to detect and quantify Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by quantitative PCR for environmental air samples , 2004, Mycopathologia.

[28]  Chih S Li,et al.  Fluorochrome and flow cytometry to monitor microorganisms in treated hospital wastewater , 2007, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[29]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[30]  Chihshan Li,et al.  Sampling Performance for Bioaerosols by Flow Cytometry with Fluorochrome , 2005 .

[31]  B. Crook,et al.  Sampling and assay of bioaerosols in the work environment , 1997 .

[32]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[33]  Xiping Xu,et al.  Respiratory health hazards in agriculture. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  P. Thorne,et al.  Application of flow cytometry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for assessment of exposures to airborne bacteria , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[35]  R. Rylander,et al.  Airways inflammation among workers in poultry houses , 2006, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[36]  Chihshan Li,et al.  Fluorochrome and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization to Monitor Bioaerosols in Swine Buildings , 2005 .

[37]  L. Ranjard,et al.  Assessing genetic structure and diversity of airborne bacterial communities by DNA fingerprinting and 16s rDNA clone library , 2005 .

[38]  Xiao‐Ru Wang,et al.  Detection and Quantification of Wallemia sebi in Aerosols by Real-Time PCR, Conventional PCR, and Cultivation , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[39]  E. Delong,et al.  Environmental diversity of bacteria and archaea. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[40]  J. Lues,et al.  Quantification of bioaerosols in automated chicken egg production plants. , 2004, Poultry science.

[41]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of Fluorescence Microscopy and Solid-Phase Cytometry Methods for Counting Bacteria in Water , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[42]  C. Thiemermann,et al.  PEPTIDOGLYCAN-AN ENDOTOXIN IN ITS OWN RIGHT? , 2006, Shock.

[43]  J. D. Cooley,et al.  Airborne Microbial Flora in a Cattle Feedlot , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[44]  A. Gotoh,et al.  Rapid detection and differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria in urine using TaqMan probe , 2005, Clinical and Experimental Medicine.

[45]  P. Lebaron,et al.  Comparison of Blue Nucleic Acid Dyes for Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Bacteria in Aquatic Systems , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[46]  Neil Hunter,et al.  Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. , 2002, Microbiology.

[47]  Gary L Andersen,et al.  Development of a high‐volume aerosol collection system for the identification of air‐borne micro‐organisms , 2002, Letters in applied microbiology.

[48]  G. Lloyd-Jones,et al.  Comparison of rapid DNA extraction methods applied to contrasting New Zealand soils , 2001 .