Investigation on constrained matrix factorization for hyperspectral image analysis

Abstract — Matrix factorization is applied to unsupervised linear unmixing for hyperspectral imagery. The algorithm, called non-negative matrix factorization, is used. It imposes a constraint on the non-negativity of the amplitudes of the recovered endmember spectral signatures as well as their fractional abundances. This ensures the recovery of physically meaningful endmembers and their abundances. This algorithm is further modified to include the sum-to-one constraint such that the sum of the fractional abundances for each pixel is unity. Several practical implementation issues in hyperspectral image unmixng are discussed. Some preliminary results from AVIRIS experiments are presented. We also discuss the advantages and possible limitations of this method in hyperspectral image analysis. Keywords: matrix factorization; nonnegative matrix factorization; linear mixture model; unsupervised linear unmixing; hyperspectral imagery. I. I NTRODUCTION Linear unmixing analysis is a well-known technique in remote sensing image analysis. It is based on the fact that the rough spatial resolution permits different materials present in the area covered by a single pixel. The linear mixture model says that a pixel reflectance in a visible-near infrared multispectral or hyperspectral image is the linear mixture from all independent pure materials (endmembers) present in an image scene [1]. Let

[1]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Nonnegative matrix factorization for rapid recovery of constituent spectra in magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging of the brain , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Miguel Velez-Reyes,et al.  An algorithm for unsupervised unmixing of hyperspectral imagery using positive matrix factorization , 2005 .

[4]  Victoria Stodden,et al.  When Does Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Give a Correct Decomposition into Parts? , 2003, NIPS.

[5]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[6]  M. Bernhardt,et al.  New models for hyperspectral anomaly detection and un-mixing , 2005 .

[7]  Paul B. Shepson,et al.  Analysis of Air Quality Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization , 1999 .

[8]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[9]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  P. Paatero,et al.  Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values† , 1994 .

[11]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.