Automatic CAD Models Comparison and Re-meshing in the Context of Mechanical Design Optimization

A lot of research work has been focused on integrating FEA (finite elements analysis) with CAD (Computer Aided Design) over the last decade. In spite of improvements brought by this integration, research work remains to be done in order to better integrate all the operations led during the whole design process. The design process involves several modifications of an initial design solution and until now, in this context, the communication between CAD modules (dedicated to different tasks involved in the product design process) remains static. Consequently, there is a need for more flexible communication processes between CAD modules through the design cycle, if not through the product life cycle. Some approaches have been developed aiming at the reduction of the design process length when using FEA, and aiming at the automation of part’s data transfer from one step of the process to the next one. Automatic re-meshing is one of these approaches. It consists in automatically updating the part’s mesh around modifications zones, in the case of a minor change in the part’s design, without the need to re-mesh the entire part. The purpose of this paper is to present a new tool, aiming at the improvement of automatic re-meshing procedures. This tool basically consists in automatically identifying and locating modifications between two versions of a CAD model (typically an initial design and a modified design) through the design process. The knowledge of these modifications is then used to fit portions of the initial design’s mesh to the modified design (a process referred to as automatic re-meshing). A major benefit of the approach presented here is that it is completely independent of the description frame of both models, which is made possible with the use of vector-based geometric representations.

[1]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Shape-similarity search of 3D models by using enhanced shape functions , 2003, Proceedings of Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, 2003..

[2]  Pierre Bourdet,et al.  Geometric Product Specification and Verification: Integration of Functionality , 2003 .

[3]  Michael E. Mortenson,et al.  Geometric Modeling , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[4]  Jean-Christophe Cuillière,et al.  3D automatic remeshing applied to model modification , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Vincent François,et al.  An a Priori Adaptive 3D Advancing Front Mesh Generator Integrated to Solid Modeling , 2003 .

[6]  Debasish Dutta,et al.  Feature Based Shape Similarity Measurement for Retrieval of Mechanical Parts , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  William C. Regli,et al.  Machining feature-based comparisons of mechanical parts , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[8]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  A Survey of Shape Similarity Assessment Algorithms for Product Design and Manufacturing Applications , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[11]  Philippe Serré,et al.  The TTRSs : 13 Constraints for Dimensioning and Tolerancing , 1998 .

[12]  Dietmar Saupe,et al.  3D Model Retrieval with Spherical Harmonics and Moments , 2001, DAGM-Symposium.

[13]  L. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communications.

[14]  Jean-Christophe Cuillière,et al.  Automatic mesh pre-optimization based on the geometric discretization error , 2000 .

[15]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Matching 3D models with shape distributions , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[16]  Sungchan Kim,et al.  Similarity Comparison of Mechanical Parts , 2005 .