Face-Centered Anisotropic Surface Impedance Boundary Conditions in FDTD

Thin-sheet models are essential to allow shielding effectiveness of composite enclosures and vehicles to be modeled. Thin dispersive sheets are often modeled using surface-impedance models in finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) codes in order to deal efficiently with the multiscale nature of the overall structure. Such boundary conditions must be applied to collocated tangential electric and magnetic fields on either side of the surface; this is usually done on the edges of the FDTD mesh cells at the electric field sampling points. However, these edge-based schemes are difficult to implement accurately on stair-cased surfaces. Here, we present a novel face-centered approach to the collocation of the fields for the application of the boundary condition. This approach naturally deals with the ambiguities in the surface normal that arise at the edges on stair-cased surfaces, allowing a simpler implementation. The accuracy of the new scheme is compared to edge-based and conformal approaches using both planar sheet and spherical shell canonical test cases. Staircasing effects are quantified and the new face-centered scheme is shown have up to 3-dB lower error than the edge-based approach in the cases considered, without the complexity and computational cost of conformal techniques.

[1]  M. A. Tassoudji,et al.  Finite Difference Time Domain (Fdtd) Impedance Boundary Condition for Thin Finite Conducting Sheets- Abstract , 2000 .

[2]  Vahid Nayyeri,et al.  Modeling Graphene in the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method Using a Surface Boundary Condition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  Gregory Kobidze Implementation of Collocated Surface Impedance Boundary Conditions in FDTD , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Designing Graphene-Based Absorber by Using HIE-FDTD Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Vahid Nayyeri,et al.  A Method to Model Thin Conductive Layers in the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  M. Karkkainen,et al.  Finite-difference time-domain modeling of frequency selective surfaces using impedance sheet conditions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  John B. Schneider,et al.  Understanding the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 2011 .

[8]  Y. E. Yang,et al.  Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Impedance Boundary Condition for Thin Finite Conducting Sheets , 2001 .

[9]  A. Semlyen,et al.  Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting , 1999 .

[10]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Shielding Effectiveness of Protective Metallic Wire Meshes: EM Modeling and Validation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[12]  I. Flintoft,et al.  A Hybrid Crank–Nicolson FDTD Subgridding Boundary Condition for Lossy Thin-Layer Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  M. M. Feliziani Subcell FDTD Modeling of Field Penetration Through Lossy Shields , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  John F. Dawson,et al.  Efficient Modelling Of Thin Conducting Sheets Within The TLM Method , 1996 .

[15]  Stephen D. Gedney,et al.  Introduction to the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) Method for Electromagnetics , 2011, Synthesis Lectures on Computational Electromagnetics.

[16]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  A new model for the FDTD analysis of the shielding performances of thin composite structures , 1999 .

[17]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Analyzing carbon-fiber composite materials with equivalent-Layer models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[18]  N. Kuster,et al.  A new 3-D conformal PEC FDTD scheme with user-defined geometric precision and derived stability criterion , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[19]  S. Garcia,et al.  A New Efficient and Stable 3D Conformal FDTD , 2016, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[20]  M. Robinson,et al.  Face centered anisotropic surface impedance boundary conditions in FDTD: Improved performance of staircased mesh for shielding problems , 2017, 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Numerical Electromagnetic and Multiphysics Modeling and Optimization for RF, Microwave, and Terahertz Applications (NEMO).

[21]  Trevor M. Benson,et al.  Modeling Curved Carbon Fiber Composite (CFC) Structures in the Transmission-Line Modeling (TLM) Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[22]  Glenn S. Smith,et al.  The efficient modeling of thin material sheets in the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method , 1992 .

[23]  M.S. Sarto,et al.  Lightning Indirect Effects Certification of a Transport Aircraft by Numerical Simulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[24]  R. Mittra,et al.  A locally conformal finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm for modeling three-dimensional perfectly conducting objects , 1997 .

[25]  M. Ansarizadeh Calculation of the Shielding Effectiveness of Carbon-Fiber Composite Structures , 2013 .