A context adaptive predictor of sensor pattern noise for camera source identification

Sensor pattern noise (SPN) is a noise-like spread-spectrum signal inherently cast onto every digital image by each imaging device and has been recognised as a reliable device fingerprint for camera source identification (CSI) and image origin verification. It can be estimated as the noise residual between the image content and its denoised version. However, the SPN extracted from a single image can be contaminated largely by image scene because image edge noise is usually much stronger than the SPN. So the identification performance is heavily dependent upon the purity of the estimated SPN, especially for small size images because they have less and weaker SPN. Although there are some existing works dedicated to improving the performance of source camera identification, an effective method to eliminate the contamination of image scene and extract an accurate SPN is currently lacking. In this paper, we will propose an edge adaptive SPN predictor based on context adaptive interpolation (PCAI) to exclude the contamination of image scene. Different from most of the existing methods extracting SPN from wavelet high frequency coefficients, we extract SPN directly from the spatial domain with a pixel-wise adaptive Wiener filter, based on the assumption that the SPN is a white signal. Extensive experiments show that our proposed PCAI method achieves the best receiver operating characteristic (ROC) performance among all of the state-of-the-art CSI schemes on different sizes of images, and has the best performance in resisting JPEG compression (e.g. with a quality factor of 90%) simultaneously.

[1]  Mo Chen,et al.  Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[2]  Jiwu Huang,et al.  Enhancing Source Camera Identification Performance With a Camera Reference Phase Sensor Pattern Noise , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[3]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Context-based, adaptive, lossless image coding , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[4]  Francesco G. B. De Natale,et al.  Performance comparison of denoising filters for source camera identification , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Min Wu,et al.  Digital image forensics via intrinsic fingerprints , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[6]  Volume Assp,et al.  ACOUSTICS. SPEECH. AND SIGNAL PROCESSING , 1983 .

[7]  Mo Chen,et al.  Imaging Sensor Noise as Digital X-Ray for Revealing Forgeries , 2007, Information Hiding.

[8]  Min Wu,et al.  Exploring compression effects for improved source camera identification using strongly compressed video , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Min Wu,et al.  Nonintrusive component forensics of visual sensors using output images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[10]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  Efficient Compression of Encrypted Grayscale Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[12]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital Camera Identification from Images - Estimating False Acceptance Probability , 2008, IWDW.

[13]  Giulia Boato,et al.  Analysis of sensor fingerprint for source camera identification , 2011 .

[14]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[15]  Chang-Tsun Li Source camera identification using enhanced sensor pattern noise , 2010, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[16]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.