A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility

The super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is obtained when a decision making unit (DMU) under evaluation is excluded from the reference set. This model provides for a measure of stability of the “efficient” status for frontier DMUs. Under the assumption of variable returns to scale (VRS), the super efficiency model can be infeasible for some efficient DMUs, specifically those at the extremities of the frontier. The current study develops an approach to overcome infeasibility issues. It is shown that when the model is feasible, our approach yields super-efficiency scores that are equivalent to those arising from the original model. For efficient DMUs that are infeasible under the super-efficiency model, our approach yields optimal solutions and scores that characterize the extent of super-efficiency in both inputs and outputs. The newly developed approach is illustrated with two real world data sets.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Betty L. Hickman,et al.  Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix , 1997 .

[3]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  John J. Rousseau,et al.  Two-person ratio efficiency games , 1995 .

[5]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Models for performance benchmarking: Measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance , 2004 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  An acceptance system decision rule with data envelopment analysis , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Analysis of Cost Variances for Management Control in Hospitals , 1990 .

[12]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes and Fisher Ideal Indexes , 1992 .

[14]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Ranking Efficient Units in DEA , 2011 .

[15]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .