Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.

Four normally-hearing subjects were trained and tested with all combinations of a highly-degraded auditory input, a visual input via lipreading, and a tactile input using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. The speech perception of the subjects was assessed with closed sets of vowels, consonants, and multisyllabic words; with open sets of words and sentences, and with speech tracking. When the visual input was added to any combination of other inputs, a significant improvement occurred for every test. Similarly, the auditory input produced a significant improvement for all tests except closed-set vowel recognition. The tactile input produced scores that were significantly greater than chance in isolation, but combined less effectively with the other modalities. The addition of the tactile input did produce significant improvements for vowel recognition in the auditory-tactile condition, for consonant recognition in the auditory-tactile and visual-tactile conditions, and in open-set word recognition in the visual-tactile condition. Information transmission analysis of the features of vowels and consonants indicated that the information from auditory and visual inputs were integrated much more effectively than information from the tactile input. The less effective combination might be due to lack of training with the tactile input, or to more fundamental limitations in the processing of multimodal stimuli.

[1]  P L Brooks,et al.  Acquisition of a 250-word vocabulary through a tactile vocoder. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  F A Saunders Information transmission across the skin: high-resolution tactile sensory aids for the deaf and the blind. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Basic and applied research on tactile aids for deaf people: Progress and prospects , 1984 .

[4]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[5]  B L Scott,et al.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Siegfried Engelmann,et al.  Tactual Hearing Experiment with Deaf and Hearing Subjects , 1975 .

[7]  P M Seligman,et al.  A multi-channel hearing prosthesis for profound-to-total hearing loss. , 1984, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  R. Campbell,et al.  Hearing by Eye , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Robert H. Gault,et al.  Progress in experiments on tactual interpretation of oral speech. , 1924 .

[10]  C M Reed,et al.  Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[12]  P J Blamey,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Pickett,et al.  COMMUNICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS BY A TACTUAL VOCODER. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  P M Seligman,et al.  Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Geoff Plant,et al.  A single-transducer vibrotactile aid to lipreading , 1987, Speech Commun..

[16]  Brian E. Walden,et al.  Auditory and Audiovisual Feature Transmission in Hearing-Impaired Adults , 1975 .

[17]  J E Widen,et al.  Assessment techniques to evaluate tactual aids for hearing-impaired subjects. , 1988, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  A. E. Edmonds,et al.  Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  John Bamford,et al.  Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .

[21]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Erratum: Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 212 (1954)] , 1954 .

[22]  J. Bernard,et al.  Toward the Acoustic Specification of Australian English , 1970 .

[23]  G. Clark,et al.  Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. Massaro Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .