Upper nasal hemifield location and nonspatial auditory tones accelerate visual detection during dichoptic viewing

Visual performance is asymmetric across the visual field, but locational biases that occur during dichoptic viewing are not well understood. In this study, we characterized horizontal, vertical and naso-temporal biases in visual target detection during dichoptic stimulation and explored whether the detection was facilitated by non-spatial auditory tones associated with the target’s location. The detection time for single monocular targets that were suppressed from view with a 10 Hz dynamic noise mask presented to the other eye was measured at the 4° intercardinal location of each eye with the breaking Continuous Flash Suppression (b-CFS) technique. Each target was either combined with a sound (i.e., high or low pitch tone) that was congruent or incongruent with its vertical location (i.e., upper or lower visual field) or presented without a sound. The results indicated faster detection of targets in the upper rather than lower visual field and faster detection of targets in the nasal than temporal hemifield of each eye. Sounds generally accelerated target detection, but the tone pitch-elevation congruency did not further enhance performance. These findings suggest that visual detection during dichoptic viewing differs from standard viewing conditions with respect to location-related perceptual biases and crossmodal modulation of visual perception. These differences should be carefully considered in experimental designs employing dichoptic stimulation techniques and in display applications that utilize dichoptic viewing.

[1]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measure , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[3]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[5]  日本規格協会 Acoustics : normal equal-loudness-level contours = 音響 : 正常な音の大きさの等感曲線 , 2004 .

[6]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Benefits of multisensory learning , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[8]  Michael W. Levine,et al.  The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Miguel Castelo-Branco,et al.  Asymmetry of visual sensory mechanisms: electrophysiological, structural, and psychophysical evidences. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Sound Facilitates Visual Learning , 2006, Current Biology.

[13]  A. Sack,et al.  The hybrid model of attentional control: New insights into hemispheric asymmetries inferred from TMS research , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  C. Westbury Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task , 2005, Brain and Language.

[15]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[17]  Louise Kauffmann,et al.  The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[18]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Visual FMRI responses in human superior colliculus show a temporal-nasal asymmetry that is absent in lateral geniculate and visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[20]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The time-course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals , 1969 .

[22]  M. Fahle,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex , 1988, Vision Research.

[23]  Su-Ling Yeh,et al.  Accessing the meaning of invisible words , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  A. Henik,et al.  The Endogenous Modulation of IOR is Nasal-Temporal Asymmetric , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Philipp Sterzer,et al.  Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[26]  S. Los,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R. van Ee,et al.  Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression , 2015, i-Perception.

[28]  Miguel Castelo-Branco,et al.  Retinal and cortical patterns of spatial anisotropy in contrast sensitivity tasks , 2008, Vision Research.

[29]  Jukka Häkkinen,et al.  CFS MATLAB toolbox: An experiment builder for continuous flash suppression (CFS) task , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[30]  M. Kleiner,et al.  Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[31]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  Rivalry and interference with a head-mounted display , 2002, TCHI.

[33]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  S. Christman,et al.  Upper and lower visual field differences in categorical and coordinate judgments , 1998 .

[35]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Scope and Limits of Top-Down Attention in Unconscious Visual Processing , 2006, Current Biology.

[36]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[37]  Robert Fox,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Head-Worn Displays , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[38]  Charles Spence,et al.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Changes in auditory frequency guide visual–spatial attention , 2011, Cognition.

[40]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Cross-Modality Correspondence between Pitch and Spatial Location Modulates Attentional Orienting , 2012, Perception.

[41]  David Mumford,et al.  Occlusion Models for Natural Images: A Statistical Study of a Scale-Invariant Dead Leaves Model , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[42]  Kevin G. Munhall,et al.  Detection of Audiovisual Speech Correspondences Without Visual Awareness , 2013, Psychological science.

[43]  P. Kaushall FUNCTIONAL ASYMMETRIES OF THE HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM AS REVEALED BY BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND BINOCULAR BRIGHTNESS MATCHING* , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[44]  Takashi Kawai,et al.  Visual task performance using a monocular see-through head-mounted display (HMD) while walking. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[45]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[46]  P. Hsieh,et al.  Can a Word Sound Like a Shape Before You Have Seen It? Sound-Shape Mapping Prior to Conscious Awareness , 2017, Psychological science.

[47]  M. Morrone,et al.  Auditory and Tactile Signals Combine to Influence Vision during Binocular Rivalry , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Sheng He,et al.  Temporal characteristics of binocular rivalry: visual field asymmetries , 2003, Vision Research.

[49]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Su-Ling Yeh,et al.  Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency matters , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Sheng He,et al.  Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.

[52]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  I. Spence,et al.  Upper visual field advantage in localizing a target among distractors , 2014, i-Perception.

[54]  M. Niemeier,et al.  Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Vertical orienting control: evidence for attentional bias and "neglect" in the intact brain. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The representation of the visual field in parvicellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  George M. Gould,et al.  A METHOD OF DETERMINING OCULAR DOMINANCE , 1910 .

[59]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[60]  Hiroshi Uozato,et al.  Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Eyes in Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[61]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[62]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  Wolfgang Sanz,et al.  Laser-optical investigation of stator-rotor interaction in a transonic turbine , 2006, J. Vis..

[64]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Stimulus Fractionation by Interocular Suppression , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[65]  Su-Ling Yeh,et al.  Crossmodal Constraints on Human Perceptual Awareness: Auditory Semantic Modulation of Binocular Rivalry , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[66]  G. Yovel,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  Victoria J. Bourne The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations , 2006, Laterality.