How far cardiac cells can see each other mechanically

We ask the question whether cardiac cells, separated by a soft solid medium, can interact with one another mechanically, and if so, then how does the interaction depend on cell–cell separation, and the stiffness of the medium. First, we show that cardiac cells can be stimulated by a mechanical signal alone. We culture primary chicken embryonic cardiomyocytes on a 2D soft substrate. A mechanical probe is used to apply local cyclic stretch on the substrate near quiescent cells (cells not beating). Within 10 cycles of stretch, the cells begin to beat, and continue to do so for hours after the stimulation, while control non-beating cells remain quiescent. Next, we show that a beating cardiac cell (instead of the probe) can stimulate a neighbor. Our 2D culture of cardiomyocytes on a deformable soft substrate (0.5–1 kPa) shows that closer the cells are as a pair, higher is the probability of both of them beating over longer time. This probability is much higher than that of both cells beating as a pair when they are cultured on a harder substrate (47 kPa), or the probability of a single cell beating on the same soft substrate (0.5–1 kPa). The cell–cell interaction, namely, the stretch induced by one contractile cell onto another is modeled using the principles of continuum mechanics. The close correspondence between the predicted cell–cell interaction and the experimental observations suggests that cardiac cells are mechanically coupled through the deformable substrate, and that the coupling decreases with increasing distance between them and the substrate stiffness. The quantitative analysis and the experimental results provide a biophysical basis for the understanding of cell–cell interaction in cardiac tissue through the deformation field of the in vivo soft microenvironment.

[1]  J. Ulrich [Physiology of the heart]. , 1950, Zeitschrift fur Kreislaufforschung.

[2]  I. Harary,et al.  In vitro Studies of Single Isolated Beating Heart Cells , 1960, Science.

[3]  G E Mark,et al.  Pacemaker activity and mitosis in cultures of newborn rat heart ventricle cells. , 1966, Experimental cell research.

[4]  F Sachs,et al.  Stretch‐activated single ion channel currents in tissue‐cultured embryonic chick skeletal muscle. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. Sachs Biophysics of mechanoreception. , 1986, Membrane biochemistry.

[6]  Cardiac Electrophysiology from Cell to Bedside. By Douglas P. Zipes and Jose Jalife W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia (1990) 1070 pages, illustrated, $1 30 ISBN: 0‐72 16‐ 1408‐6 , 1991 .

[7]  F Sachs,et al.  Stretch-activated channels in heart cells: relevance to cardiac hypertrophy. , 1991, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[8]  D. Kim,et al.  A mechanosensitive K+ channel in heart cells. Activation by arachidonic acid , 1992, The Journal of general physiology.

[9]  A. Noma,et al.  Effects of mechanical stretch on membrane currents of single ventricular myocytes of guinea-pig heart. , 1992, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[10]  T. Streubel,et al.  Mechanosensitive cells in the atrium of frog heart , 1992, Experimental physiology.

[11]  AC Tose Cell , 1993, Cell.

[12]  W Craelius,et al.  Stretch‐activation of rat cardiac myocytes , 1993, Experimental physiology.

[13]  F. Sachs,et al.  Mechanically Activated Currents in Chick Heart Cells , 1996, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[14]  R. E. Palmer,et al.  Mechanical measurements from isolated cardiac myocytes using a pipette attachment system. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  M R Franz,et al.  Mechano-electrical feedback in ventricular myocardium. , 1996, Cardiovascular research.

[16]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[18]  Y. Zou,et al.  Role of ion channels and exchangers in mechanical stretch-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. , 1998, Circulation research.

[19]  Lionel H. Opie,et al.  Heart Physiology: From Cell to Circulation , 2003 .

[20]  M. Janse,et al.  Heart Cell Communication in Health and Disease , 1998, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[21]  Y. Wang,et al.  Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates , 1999, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[23]  G. Bett,et al.  Stretch-activated whole cell currents in adult rat cardiac myocytes. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[25]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Critical evaluation of the interpretation of AFM stiffness measurements on living cells , 2001 .

[27]  Cyclic stretch and endothelin-1 mediated activation of chloride channels in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2002, Clinical science.

[28]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels† , 2003 .

[29]  Leslie Tung,et al.  Stretch-induced excitation and action potential changes of single cardiac cells. , 2003, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[30]  M. Miragoli,et al.  Coupling of Cardiac Electrical Activity Over Extended Distances by Fibroblasts of Cardiac Origin , 2003, Circulation research.

[31]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[34]  W. Burns,et al.  Connective Tissue Growth Factor and Cardiac Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction , 2005, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[35]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[36]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Bulk and micropatterned conjugation of extracellular matrix proteins to characterized polyacrylamide substrates for cell mechanotransduction assays. , 2005, BioTechniques.

[37]  N. Bursac,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Mechanoelectrical excitation by fluid jets in monolayers of cultured cardiac myocytes , 2005 .

[38]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Cardiac mechano-electric feedback and arrhythmias : from pipette to patient , 2005 .

[39]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  Cross‐talk between the mechano‐gated K2P channel TREK‐1 and the actin cytoskeleton , 2005, EMBO reports.

[40]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Mechanotransduction involving multimodular proteins: converting force into biochemical signals. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[41]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  Alan Garny,et al.  Effects of mechanosensitive ion channels on ventricular electrophysiology: experimental and theoretical models , 2006, Experimental physiology.

[43]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance , 2006 .

[44]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[45]  V. Riechmann,et al.  The Role of the Actomyosin Cytoskeleton in Coordination of Tissue Growth during Drosophila Oogenesis , 2007, Current Biology.

[46]  Thomas Lecuit,et al.  Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis , 2007, Nature.

[47]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[49]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[50]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[52]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[53]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[54]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  Stiffness of the substrate influences the phenotype of embryonic chicken cardiac myocytes. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.