Expressions of second occurrence focus in German

In a production study on read German, we investigate the tonal, durational and articulatory parameters used in the marking of three different focus structures. Special attention is paid to target words in Second Occurrence Focus (SOF). Such words are both focussed and contextually given. Prominence in SOF items is compared to prominence in items which are focussed and new (First Occurrence Focus, FOF) and those which are in the Background. Results confirm previous findings that SOF is not marked by a pitch accent. However, we observe gradient but systematic adjustments of acoustic and articulatory parameters (word durations and temporal and spacial modifications of opening and closing gestures) leading to an increase in prominence from Background through SOF to FOF. The extent to which single speakers employ different strategies varies. Phonologically, we propose an analysis of SOF prominences as phrase accents.

[1]  Martine Grice,et al.  Deutsche Intonation und GToBI , 2002 .

[2]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Phonetic correlates of Second occurrence Focus , 2005 .

[3]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Second Occurrence Focus and Relativized Stress F , 2009 .

[4]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Articulatory Vowel Lengthening and Coordination at Phrasal Junctures , 2000, Phonetica.

[5]  Mats Rooth On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus , 1996 .

[6]  V L Gracco,et al.  Some organizational characteristics of speech movement control. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  P. Perrier,et al.  A kinematic study of prosodic boundary effects on /i/ articulation in French. , 2003 .

[8]  David I. Beaver,et al.  When Semantics Meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies of Second-Occurrence Focus , 2007 .

[9]  Jonathan Howell,et al.  Second Occurrence Focus and theAcoustics of Prominence , 2006 .

[10]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system , 2001, Speech Commun..

[11]  M. Tabain Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: articulatory results. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology , 2000, Phonology.

[13]  Martine Grice,et al.  The intonation of accessibility , 2006 .

[14]  S. Baumann,et al.  TONAL AND ARTICULATORY MARKING OF FOCUS IN GERMAN , 2007 .

[15]  H. Hill,et al.  Visual Correlates of Prosodic Contrastive Focus in French: Description and Inter-Speaker Variability , 2006 .

[16]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[17]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[18]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .