Using Multicriteria Methods in the Early Stages of New Product Development

The R&D manager is commonly faced with the problem of deciding which projects to fund to meet overall corporate and technical goals. Because outcomes can rarely be predicted with certainty, decisions aimed at striking a balance between cost and risk are likely to involve some amount of redundancy at the project level. The intent of this paper is to examine the difficulties that arise when trying to pursue a parallel strategy in the presence of multiple objectives. The basic elements of the problem include a set of projects, a set of objectives, the associated probability measures relating effort to success, budgetary and performance constraints, and a utility function defined on the range of outcomes. In the model it will be assumed that each project contributes to one or more objectives, and that the selection criterion is based on expected utility maximization. With this in mind, the problem is formulated as a probabilistic goal programme and solved with a heuristic that computes the K best funding schemes. Results are presented for a case involving the development of a non-petroleum-powered vehicle which demonstrate the robustness of the algorithm and the implications of the underlying decision rules.

[1]  A. Mehrez,et al.  Resource Allocation to Interrelated Risky Projects Using a Multiattribute Utility Function , 1983 .

[2]  Norman R. Baker,et al.  Economic Models for R and D Project Selection in the Presence of Project Interactions , 1984 .

[3]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Discrete Multiattribute Utility Approach to Project Selection , 1987 .

[4]  W. Souder Analytical Effectiveness of Mathematical Models for R&D Project Selection , 1973 .

[5]  F Jonathan Bard,et al.  A Multiobjective Methodology for Selecting Subsystem Automation Options , 1986 .

[6]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  R. F. Miles The SIMRAND methodology - Simulation of Research and Development Projects , 1984 .

[8]  A. Feinberg,et al.  A two-phase methodology for technology selection and system design , 1989 .

[9]  James P. Ignizio,et al.  Linear Programming in Single- and Multiple-Objective Systems , 1984 .

[10]  Bernardo Villarreal,et al.  Multicriteria integer programming: A (hybrid) dynamic programming recursive approach , 1981, Math. Program..

[11]  James P. Ignizio,et al.  The determination of a subset of efficient solutions via goal programming , 1981, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  D. Keefer Allocation planning for R & D with uncertainty and multiple objectives , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Strategic planning for investment in R&D using decision analysis and mathematical programming , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  D. Grossman,et al.  Dynamic time-staged model for R&D portfolio planning — A real world case , 1974 .

[15]  J. Dyer Interactive Goal Programming , 1972 .

[16]  Neil R. Baker,et al.  R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment , 1974, R&D Management.

[17]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  A Zero-One Goal-Programming Algorithm Using Partitioning and Constraint Aggregation , 1987 .

[18]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions , 1977 .

[19]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  An Interactive Multiple Objective Decision-Making Aid Using Nonlinear Goal Programming , 1976 .

[20]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Managerial Differences in Assessing Probabilities of Technical Success for R&D Projects , 1977 .

[21]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Parallel Strategies in Development Projects , 1969 .