How Do Distance Learners Connect?

Distance learners often experience social isolation and impoverished social interaction with their remote peers. To better understand the connections that distance learners are able to build with peers, we interviewed them about whether and how they perceive or cultivate connections with one another. Our analysis reveals how connections in an online learning environment are formed and experienced across different social contexts and technology affordances, and what strategies and practices enable and inhibit these connections. We discuss the implications of our findings for concepts of shared identity and evolving peer relationships among online learners and for design directions that might address their social needs.

[1]  Amy Voida,et al.  Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters , 2010, GROUP.

[2]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  The Classroom and School Community Inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Rupert Wegerif,et al.  The Social Dimension of Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2019, Online Learning.

[4]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Finding the Community in Online Education: It's in the Instructors' Eyes , 2017, CSCL.

[5]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[6]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[7]  Grace Kena,et al.  The Condition of Education 2015. NCES 2015-144. , 2015 .

[8]  David R. Moore,et al.  Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interaction. , 1998 .

[9]  Allison Rossett,et al.  Using Supportive Planning Software To Help Teachers Integrate Technology into Teaching. , 1998 .

[10]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Jennifer Marlow,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Audience Visibility on Presenters and Attendees in Online Educational Presentations , 2017, C&T.

[12]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Social transparency in networked information exchange: a theoretical framework , 2012, CSCW.

[13]  June Ahn,et al.  Designing futures for peer-to-peer learning @ CSCW , 2014, CSCW Companion '14.

[14]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative research in practice : examples for discussion and analysis , 2002 .

[15]  Jennifer Marlow,et al.  Designing interventions to reduce psychological distance in globally distributed teams , 2012, CSCW.

[16]  Xiang Cao,et al.  Understanding family communication across time zones , 2010, CSCW '10.

[17]  R. Hofman,et al.  Social context effects on pupils' perception of school , 2001 .

[18]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[19]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Google+ Communities as Plazas and Topic Boards , 2015, CHI.

[20]  D. Gašević,et al.  “Choose Your Classmates, Your GPA Is at Stake!” , 2013 .

[21]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  When Life and Learning Do Not Fit: Challenges of Workload and Communication in Introductory Computer Science Online , 2012, TOCE.

[22]  Patrick C. Shih,et al.  Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs , 2015, CSCW.

[23]  Sarah Carr.  As Distance Education Comes of Age, the Challenge Is Keeping the Students. , 2000 .

[24]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[25]  Anirban Dasgupta,et al.  Superposter behavior in MOOC forums , 2014, L@S.

[26]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Where is Community Among Online Learners?: Identity, Efficacy and Personal Ties , 2018, CHI.

[28]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Connection Enablers in Online Learning Community: From Informative Online Personae to Meaningful Social Space , 2017, CSCW Companion.

[29]  Allison BrckaLorenz,et al.  Reimagining Student Engagement: How Nontraditional Adult Learners Engage in Traditional Postsecondary Environments , 2018 .

[30]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Theories of Cognition in CSCW , 2011, ECSCW.

[32]  Hanna Ashar,et al.  Can Tinto's Student Departure Model Be Applied To Nontraditional Students? , 1993 .

[33]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  宋根源.  2000 , 2000, Ringstraße ist überall.

[35]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[36]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[37]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Augmenting classroom participation through public digital backchannels , 2012, GROUP.

[38]  Vincent Tinto.  Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research , 1975 .

[39]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online , 2011, CSCW.

[40]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[41]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Students' Uses and Gratifications for Using Computer-Mediated Communication Media in Learning Contexts , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events , 2006, Psychological science.

[43]  Richard C. Overbaugh,et al.  A comparison of student satisfaction and value of academic community between blended and online sections of a university-level educational foundations course , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[44]  David R. Karger,et al.  Using Student Annotated Hashtags and Emojis to Collect Nuanced Affective States , 2017, L@S.

[45]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Wild at Home: The Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI , 2013, TCHI.

[46]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  Alumni & Tenured Participants in MOOCs: Analysis of Two Years of MOOC Discussion Channel Activity , 2015, L@S.

[48]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[49]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems , 2011, Inf. Technol. People.

[50]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media , 2017, CSCW.

[51]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes , 2015, CSCW.

[52]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[53]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[54]  Louise Barkhuus,et al.  Student socialization in the age of facebook , 2010, CHI.

[55]  Kelly Caine,et al.  Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI , 2016, CHI.

[56]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? , 2014, CSCW.

[57]  蕭瓊瑞撰述,et al.  2009 , 2019, The Winning Cars of the Indianapolis 500.

[58]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[59]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Collective efficacy as a measure of community , 2005, CHI.

[60]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Structuring Interactions for Large-Scale Synchronous Peer Learning , 2015, CSCW.