A Complete Graphical Criterion for the Adjustment Formula in Mediation Analysis

Various assumptions have been used in the literature to identify natural direct and indirect effects in mediation analysis. These effects are of interest because they allow for effect decomposition of a total effect into a direct and indirect effect even in the presence of interactions or non-linear models. In this paper, we consider the relation and interpretation of various identification assumptions in terms of causal diagrams interpreted as a set of non-parametric structural equations. We show that for such causal diagrams, two sets of assumptions for identification that have been described in the literature are in fact equivalent in the sense that if either set of assumptions holds for all models inducing a particular causal diagram, then the other set of assumptions will also hold for all models inducing that diagram. We moreover build on prior work concerning a complete graphical identification criterion for covariate adjustment for total effects to provide a complete graphical criterion for using covariate adjustment to identify natural direct and indirect effects. Finally, we show that this criterion is equivalent to the two sets of independence assumptions used previously for mediation analysis.

[1]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  Alternative Assumptions for the Identification of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2011, Epidemiology.

[2]  T. VanderWeele,et al.  Is there a direct effect of pre-eclampsia on cerebral palsy not through preterm birth? , 2011, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[3]  T. VanderWeele.  Controlled Direct and Mediated Effects: Definition, Identification and Bounds , 2010, Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications.

[4]  James M. Robins,et al.  On the Validity of Covariate Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects , 2010, UAI.

[5]  T. VanderWeele.  Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect Effects , 2010, Epidemiology.

[6]  L. Keele,et al.  Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects , 2010, 1011.1079.

[7]  Sol Kaufman,et al.  Analytic Bounds on Causal Risk Differences in Directed Acyclic Graphs Involving Three Observed Binary Variables. , 2009, Journal of statistical planning and inference.

[8]  Arvid Sjölander,et al.  Bounds on natural direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2009, Epidemiology.

[10]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  The International Journal of Biostatistics Direct Effect Models , 2011 .

[11]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Complete Identification Methods for the Causal Hierarchy , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Judea Pearl,et al.  What Counterfactuals Can Be Tested , 2007, UAI.

[13]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Identification of Conditional Interventional Distributions , 2006, UAI.

[14]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  Estimation of Direct Causal Effects , 2006, Epidemiology.

[15]  Chen Avin,et al.  Identifiability of Path-Specific Effects , 2005, IJCAI.

[16]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[17]  J. Pearl.  Causal diagrams for empirical research , 1995 .

[18]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[19]  A. Dawid.  Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[20]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition , 2009 .

[21]  J. Robins,et al.  On Identification and Inference for Direct Effects , 2009 .

[22]  Stephen Z. Smith.  When the smoke clears. , 2005, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.

[23]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.