A Dynamic Approach to Secondary Processes in Associative Recognition

Associative recognition—the ability to discriminate between studied and novel associations—has been attributed to the operation of a recall-like process that is not engaged during recognition of single items. An alternative mechanism for associative recognition is the formation of a compound memory cue that incorporates relational information between the two elements of the association. These alternatives make different predictions about the dynamics of associative recognition as revealed by speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) functions: if recall were operating, SAT functions should approach asymptotic performance at a faster rate for stronger associations, whereas a compound cue mechanism predicts that only asymptotic performance, not rate, should be affected by strength. In a review of the literature, we find that only asymptotic performance, not rate, is affected by the strength of studied associations, supporting the operation of a compound cue mechanism. We present a formal model of this mechanism as a direct outgrowth of a model of single-item recognition (Cox & Shiffrin, 2012) and use it to predict observed SAT curves for both single-item and associative recognition in a variety of experiments.

[1]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[2]  D L Hintzman,et al.  Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[4]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  The structure of short-term memory scanning: an investigation using response time distribution models , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  S Dennis,et al.  Dual processes in recognition: Does a focus on measurement operations provide a sufficient foundation? , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[9]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[10]  Gregory E. Cox,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to Recognition Memory , 2017, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Tim Curran,et al.  ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition , 2007, Brain Research.

[13]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[14]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[15]  G D Logan,et al.  Process dissociation, cognitive architecture, and response time: comments on Lindsay and Jacoby (1994) , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[18]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Recognition Memory and Modality Judgments: A Comparison of Retrieval Dynamics , 1997 .

[19]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[20]  E. Heit,et al.  Associative Recognition: a Case of Recall-to-reject Processing , 2022 .

[21]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Criterion Setting and the Dynamics of Recognition Memory , 2011, CogSci.

[27]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[28]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[29]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[31]  Marc W Howard,et al.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. , 2008, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[33]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Configural Processing in Memory Retrieval: Multiple Cues and Ensemble Representations , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  John R. Anderson.  A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory , 1988 .

[37]  B. Dosher,et al.  Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory , 1989 .

[38]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[39]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words , 1975 .

[40]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .