Can scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI identify multifocal and multicentric primary breast cancer?

Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI has been shown to be an effective adjunct to imaging of the breast with mammography. Uptake of 99mTc-MIBI is particularly high in sites of non-calcified cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and as a consequence it may be possible to use this method of imaging in identifying multifocal or multicentric disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative scintimammography in the detection of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer and compare these results with mammography. A retrospective review was performed of 353 women imaged with 99mTc-MIBI as part of the clinical assessment of their suspected primary breast cancer. The results of the scintimammography and mammography were then compared with the final pathological diagnosis obtained after mastectomy in all patients. Histopathological assessments of breast tissue from mastectomy confirmed 40 women (12%) had multifocal (34) or multicentric (six) breast cancer. Scintimammography correctly identified 39 of these cancers and the multifocal or multicentric character of the cancer was identified in 22 (52%) of these patients. Anatomical imaging performed in all 40 patients including 25 with mammography alone, mammography and ultrasound in 11 cases and ultrasound alone in four patients. Anatomical imaging identified cancer to be present in 28 patients (70%) and the combination of mammography and ultrasound identified correctly that the cancer was multifocal or multicentric in eight patients (22%). In this study scintimammography was able to identify more cases of multifocal and multicentric cancer than mammography and/or ultrasound. In patients where pre-operative identification of multicentric or multifocal disease can alter treatment scintimammography may be a useful investigative tool.

[1]  P. Drew,et al.  Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Lindsay W. Turnbull,et al.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Is Superior to Triple Assessment for the Pre-Operative Detection of Multifocal Breast Cancer , 1999, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  D. Winchester,et al.  Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  R L Egan,et al.  Multicentric breast carcinomas: Clinical‐radiographic‐pathologic whole organ studies and 10‐year survival , 1982, Cancer.

[5]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Histologic multifocality of tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast‐conserving surgery , 1985, Cancer.

[6]  E. Merkle,et al.  MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  B. Fisher Breast-Cancer Management , 1979 .

[8]  M D Schnall,et al.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  J. Buscombe,et al.  Detection of DCIS using 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography in patients with suspected primary breast cancer, comparison with conventional mammography. , 2000, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[10]  I. Mena,et al.  Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. , 1995, Radiology.

[11]  I. Mena,et al.  Technical Aspects of Prone Dependent-Breast Scintimammography , 1994 .

[12]  W. Berg,et al.  Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  B. Fisher Sounding board. Breast-cancer management: alternatives to radical mastectomy. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Crow,et al.  Comparison of accuracy of scintimammography and X-ray mammography in the diagnosis of primary breast cancer in patients selected for surgical biopsy. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[15]  T. Davidson,et al.  Breast cancer imaging--what are the optimal modalities? , 1998, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  L. Esserman,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  D Krebs,et al.  Technetium-99m-MIBI scintimammography for suspicious breast lesions. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.