The unknown lipids project: harmonized methods improve compound identification and data reproducibility in an inter-laboratory untargeted lipidomics study

Untargeted lipidomics allows analysis of a broader range of lipids than targeted methods and permits discovery of unknown compounds. Previous ring trials have evaluated the reproducibility of targeted lipidomics methods, but inter-laboratory comparison of compound identification and unknown feature detection in untargeted lipidomics has not been attempted. To address this gap, five laboratories analyzed a set of mammalian tissue and biofluid reference samples using both their own untargeted lipidomics procedures and a common chromatographic and data analysis method. While both methods yielded informative data, the common method improved chromatographic reproducibility and resulted in detection of more shared features between labs. Spectral search against the LipidBlast in silico library enabled identification of over 2,000 unique lipids. Further examination of LC-MS/MS and ion mobility data, aided by hybrid search and spectral networking analysis, revealed spectral and chromatographic patterns useful for classification of unknown features, a subset of which were highly reproducible between labs. Overall, our method offers enhanced compound identification performance compared to targeted lipidomics, demonstrates the potential of harmonized methods to improve inter-site reproducibility for quantitation and feature alignment, and can serve as a reference to aid future annotation of untargeted lipidomics data.

[1]  John A. Bowden,et al.  Introducing the Lipidomics Minimal Reporting Checklist , 2022, Nature Metabolism.

[2]  O. Fiehn,et al.  Spectral entropy outperforms MS/MS dot product similarity for small-molecule compound identification , 2021, Nature Methods.

[3]  E. Khrameeva,et al.  The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Untargeted Lipidomics Analysis: Practical Guidelines , 2021, Metabolites.

[4]  R. Ahrends,et al.  Recommendations for good practice in MS-based lipidomics , 2021, Journal of lipid research.

[5]  T. Huan,et al.  ISFrag: De Novo Recognition of In-Source Fragments for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Charles R. Evans,et al.  metabCombiner: Paired Untargeted LC-HRMS Metabolomics Feature Matching and Concatenation of Disparately Acquired Data Sets. , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Christer S. Ejsing,et al.  Update on LIPID MAPS classification, nomenclature, and shorthand notation for MS-derived lipid structures , 2020, Journal of Lipid Research.

[8]  Xianlin Han,et al.  RECOGNITION AND AVOIDANCE OF ION SOURCE-GENERATED ARTIFACTS IN LIPIDOMICS ANALYSIS. , 2020, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[9]  Yutaka Yamada,et al.  A lipidome atlas in MS-DIAL 4 , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  George Michailidis,et al.  Deep annotation of untargeted LC-MS metabolomics data with Binner , 2019, Bioinform..

[11]  Hiroshi Tsugawa,et al.  Computational MS/MS Fragmentation and Structure Elucidation Using MS-FINDER Software , 2020 .

[12]  Thomas Züllig,et al.  Lipidomics from sample preparation to data analysis: a primer , 2019, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[13]  John A. Bowden,et al.  International Ring Trial of a High Resolution Targeted Metabolomics and Lipidomics Platform for Serum and Plasma Analysis. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  LIPID MAPS: Serving the next generation of lipid researchers with tools, resources, data, and training , 2019, Science Signaling.

[15]  A. Brunet,et al.  Cross-Platform Comparison of Untargeted and Targeted Lipidomics Approaches on Aging Mouse Plasma , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Masanori Arita,et al.  Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search. , 2018, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[17]  Meghan C. Burke,et al.  Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Masanori Arita,et al.  Identifying epimetabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass spectrometry cheminformatics , 2017, Nature Methods.

[19]  Charles R. Evans,et al.  Evaluation of intensity drift correction strategies using MetaboDrift, a normalization tool for multi-batch metabolomics data. , 2017, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  Matej Oresic,et al.  Harmonizing lipidomics: NIST interlaboratory comparison exercise for lipidomics using SRM 1950–Metabolites in Frozen Human Plasma[S] , 2017, Journal of Lipid Research.

[21]  Gary J Patti,et al.  Systems-Level Annotation of a Metabolomics Data Set Reduces 25 000 Features to Fewer than 1000 Unique Metabolites. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  W. Castell,et al.  Sulfonolipids as novel metabolite markers of Alistipes and Odoribacter affected by high-fat diets , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Kim Ekroos,et al.  Reporting of lipidomics data should be standardized. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids.

[24]  Evan Bolton,et al.  ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[25]  Lin Shi,et al.  Large-scale untargeted LC-MS metabolomics data correction using between-batch feature alignment and cluster-based within-batch signal intensity drift correction , 2016, Metabolomics.

[26]  Kazuki Saito,et al.  Hydrogen Rearrangement Rules: Computational MS/MS Fragmentation and Structure Elucidation Using MS-FINDER Software. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  Kristian Fog Nielsen,et al.  Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Joost J. B. Keurentjes,et al.  Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics , 2016, Metabolomics.

[29]  Mehmet,et al.  Practical Guidelines , 2016 .

[30]  J. Kuligowski,et al.  Intra-batch effect correction in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using quality control samples and support vector regression (QC-SVRC). , 2015, The Analyst.

[31]  Károly Héberger,et al.  Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[32]  Masanori Arita,et al.  MS-DIAL: Data Independent MS/MS Deconvolution for Comprehensive Metabolome Analysis , 2015, Nature Methods.

[33]  David S. Wishart,et al.  MetaboAnalyst 3.0—making metabolomics more meaningful , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  Interactive XCMS Online: Simplifying Advanced Metabolomic Data Processing and Subsequent Statistical Analyses , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  Stephen E. Stein,et al.  Metabolite profiling of a NIST Standard Reference Material for human plasma (SRM 1950): GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR, and clinical laboratory analyses, libraries, and web-based resources. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  New insights on glucosylated lipids: metabolism and functions. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[38]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  LipidBlast - in-silico tandem mass spectrometry database for lipid identification , 2013, Nature Methods.

[39]  David S. Wishart,et al.  MetaboAnalyst 2.0—a comprehensive server for metabolomic data analysis , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Matej Oresic,et al.  MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[41]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Lipid extraction by methyl-tert-butyl ether for high-throughput lipidomics. , 2008, Journal of lipid research.

[42]  Eoin Fahy,et al.  LIPID MAPS online tools for lipid research , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  R. Abagyan,et al.  XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[44]  S. Stein,et al.  Estimating probabilities of correct identification from results of mass spectral library searches , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.