Addressing the context of e‐learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design

The rapidly expanding range of options available for innovative e‐learning approaches based on emerging technologies has given renewed importance to teaching and learning issues that have long been familiar to distance educators. These issues arise from the separation between learners, and between teacher and learners, which occurs when learning is undertaken wholly or partly online. There may be important implications that emerge from aspects of separation, depending on whether students are studying primarily on‐campus, off‐campus, trans‐nationally, or in specific contexts such as the home, the workplace, fieldwork locations, or other places made possible by mobile learning technologies. We suggest that the context of learning has significant implications for e‐learning design, and that one way of analysing these implications is to draw on understandings from distance education, particularly the theory of transactional distance. We use cases from two Australian universities to illustrate the practical application of these implications to e‐learning design, including designs that involve Web 2.0 technologies.

[1]  Jon Dron A loophole in Moore's law of transactional distance , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings..

[2]  Farhad Saba,et al.  Critical Issues in Distance Education: A report from the United States , 2005 .

[3]  Adrian Kirkwood Learning at home with information and communication technologies , 2000 .

[4]  Yau Jane Chen,et al.  Transactional Distance in World Wide Web Learning Environments , 2001 .

[5]  Mike Moore Editorial, Constructivists: Don't Blame the Tools! , 2004 .

[6]  Jon Dron,et al.  Social Software and the Emergence of Control , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[7]  Eugene G. Kowch,et al.  Designing effective instruction , 2004 .

[8]  Alistair Morgan,et al.  Improving your students' learning : reflections on the experience of study , 1993 .

[9]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999 , 2001 .

[10]  M. Moore Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[11]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[12]  R. Boyd,et al.  Redefining the discipline of adult education , 1982 .

[13]  R. Benson,et al.  Developing the scholarship of teaching: what is the role of e-teaching and learning? , 2009 .

[14]  R. Garrison Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues , 2000 .

[15]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[16]  Farhad Saba,et al.  Verifying Key Theoretical Concepts in a Dynamic Model of Distance Education. , 1994 .

[17]  Jon Dron,et al.  Control and Constraint in E-learning: Choosing When to Choose , 2007 .

[18]  Jon Dron,et al.  Designing the Undesignable: Social Software and Control , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[20]  Avner Caspi,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Transactional Distance Theory , 2005 .

[21]  Yau-Jane Chen,et al.  Dimensions of transactional distance in the world wide web learning environment: a factor analysis , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Third Generation Distance Education: The Challenge of New Technology. , 1990 .

[23]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Distance education theory , 1991 .

[24]  David Boud,et al.  Experience and Learning: Reflection at Work. EAE600 Adults Learning in the Workplace: Part A. , 1991 .

[26]  V. Dennen,et al.  Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction , 2007 .

[27]  Felicity Wikeley *,et al.  Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance , 2004 .

[28]  Yolanda Gayol A Study of Transactional Distance in an International Audioconferencing Course , 1996 .

[29]  Aixiu Zhang,et al.  Transactional distance in Web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction , 2003 .

[30]  Sarah W. Bisconer,et al.  Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals , 1996 .

[31]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  Peter S. Cookson,et al.  The Multidimensional Audioconferencing Classification System (MACS) , 1995 .

[33]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[34]  Yau-Jane Chen,et al.  Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment , 1999 .

[35]  Robyn Benson,et al.  Teaching in context : some implications for e-learning design , 2007 .

[36]  Clay Shirky A Group is Its Own Worst Enemy , 2005 .

[37]  Margaret Gorts Morabito Foundations of Distance Education. , 1997 .

[38]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[39]  M. Moore The Theory of Transactional Distance , 2012, Handbook of Distance Education.

[40]  Terry Evans,et al.  Understanding learners in open and distance education , 1995 .

[41]  D. Hounsell The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[42]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  University Instructor Perceptions of the Use of Asynchronous Text-Based Discussion in Distance Courses , 2002 .

[43]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching 2nd Edition: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2002 .

[44]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[45]  Ron Oliver When Teaching Meets Learning : Design Principles and Strategies for Web-based Learning Environments that Support Knowledge Construction , 2000 .

[46]  Karen A. Lemone,et al.  Analyzing Cultural Influences on ELearning Transactional Issues , 2005 .

[47]  Jon Dron E-learning and the building habits of termites , 2005 .

[48]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[49]  Jon Dron,et al.  Transactional distance in a blended learning environment , 2004 .

[50]  Yau-Jane Chen,et al.  A Path Analysis Of The Concepts In Moore’s Theory Of Transactional Distance In A Videoconferencing Learning Environment , 2007 .

[51]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[52]  F. Marton Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[53]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[54]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education , 2001 .

[55]  Chris Colbourn,et al.  Mindweave: communication, computers and distance education , 1990 .

[56]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Using web tools, collaborating, and learning online , 2001 .

[57]  Muhammad K. Betz Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[58]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: An international issue , 1991 .

[59]  Kaushik Kanetkar Independent study. , 1976, Medical education.