All My People Right Here, Right Now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site

A mundane but theoretically interesting and practically relevant situation presents itself on social networking sites: the co-presence of multiple groups important to an individual. This primarily qualitative study concentrates on the point of view of individual SNS users and their perspectives on multiple group affiliations. After charting the perceived multiplicity of groups on the social networking site Facebook, we investigated the relevance of multiple groups to the users and the effect of group co-presence on psychological identification processes. Users deal with group co-presence by managing the situation to prevent anticipated conflictive and identity-threatening situations. Their behavioral strategies consist of dividing the platform into separate spaces, using suitable channels of communication, and performing self-censorship. Mental strategies include both the creation of more inclusive in-group identities and the reciprocity of trusting other users and being responsible. In addition to giving further evidence of the existence of group co-presence on SNSs, the study sheds light on the management of the phenomenon. Management of group co-presence should be supported, since otherwise users may feel the urge to resort to defensive strategies of social identity protection such as ceasing to use SNSs altogether or, less dramatically, limit their use according to "the least common denominator". Hence, the phenomenon merits the attention of researchers, developers, and designers alike.

[1]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[2]  David R. Millen,et al.  Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook , 2007, GROUP.

[3]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[4]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[5]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Blackwell handbook of social psychology: intergroup processes , 2002 .

[6]  S. Skevington,et al.  The Social identity of women , 1989 .

[7]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[8]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social Identity Complexity , 2002 .

[9]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[10]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[11]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[12]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[13]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[14]  Phyllis A. Anastasio,et al.  The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1993 .

[15]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Toward Reduction of Prejudice: Intergroup Contact and Social Categorization , 2008 .

[16]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach , 2000 .

[18]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[19]  D. Boyd.  Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy , 2003 .

[20]  John E. Hofman,et al.  Social Identity and Intergroup Conflict: An Israeli View , 1988 .